Literature DB >> 17317834

Phase I trial of intraperitoneal gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced malignancies primarily confined to the peritoneal cavity.

Robert J Morgan1, Timothy W Synold, Bixin Xi, Dean Lim, Stephen Shibata, Kim Margolin, Roderich E Schwarz, Lucille Leong, George Somlo, Przemyslaw Twardowski, Yun Yen, Warren Chow, Merry Tetef, Paul Lin, Benjamin Paz, Mariana Koczywas, Lawrence Wagman, David Chu, Paul Frankel, Susan Stalter, James H Doroshow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the maximally tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of i.p. gemcitabine. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients had peritoneal carcinomatosis. Gemcitabine (40, 80, 120, or 160 mg/m(2)) was administered into the peritoneal cavity in 2 L of warmed saline on days 1, 4, 8, and 12 of a 28-day cycle.
RESULTS: Thirty patients received 63 (median, 2; range, 0-6) courses. Tumors included ovary (14), uterus (2), colon (6), pancreas (3), and others (5). Dose-limiting toxicity included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatal respiratory failure, and grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase in three patients. Hematologic toxicity and pain were </=grade 2. Three patients had decreased or resolved ascites. Of 19 patients evaluable for response, 10 had stable disease (median, 3.5 courses) and 9 had progressive disease. The median peak peritoneal concentration was 1,116-fold (range, 456-1,886) higher than the peak plasma level. Plasma and peritoneal levels were undetectable within 8 to 12 h. At 120 mg/m(2), the median peritoneal area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) was 82,612 ng/mL x h (range, 53,296-199,830) and the plasma AUC was 231 ng/mL x h (range, 47.6-259.5). The mean peritoneal advantage (AUC(peritoneal)/AUC(plasma)) was 847 (range, 356-1,385).
CONCLUSIONS: I.p. administration of gemcitabine is tolerated within the tested dosage range. Technical problems with the Porta-Cath device and i.p. therapy per se may have been exacerbated by the enrollment of many patients with a variety of advanced i.p. diseases. Given the significant increase in local dose intensity and the documented activity of this drug, this agent may be an excellent candidate for i.p. therapy in optimally debulked ovarian cancer, either alone or in combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17317834     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

Review 1.  Current status and future strategies of cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Hassan-Alaa-Hammed Al-Shammaa; Yan Li; Yutaka Yonemura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Csilla Hasovits; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Ignace de Hingh; Kurt Van Der Speeten; Martin Hubner; Marcello Deraco; Naoual Bakrin; Laurent Villeneuve; Shigeki Kusamura; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Intraperitoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer: pathology of peritoneal carcinomatosis and rationale for intraperitoneal chemotherapy/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhong-He Ji; Kai-Wen Peng; Yan Li
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-19

5.  Feasibility of intravenous gemcitabine and an intraperitoneal platinum agent in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R L Giuntoli; R E Bristow; T P Diaz-Montes; D K Armstrong
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.714

Review 6.  Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal origin.

Authors:  F Losa; P Barrios; R Salazar; J Torres-Melero; M Benavides; T Massuti; I Ramos; E Aranda
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Intraperitoneal therapy for peritoneal tumors: biophysics and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Wim P Ceelen; Michael F Flessner
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Surgical management of colorectal peritoneal metastases: treatment and outcomes compared with hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Grace Hwei Ching Tan; Melissa Ching Ching Teo; Wallace Chen; Ser Yee Lee; Deanna Wan Jie Ng; Chee Kian Tham; Khee Chee Soo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-06

9.  A phase I trial of intraperitoneal nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced malignancies primarily confined to the peritoneal cavity.

Authors:  Mihaela C Cristea; Paul Frankel; Timothy Synold; Saul Rivkin; Dean Lim; Vincent Chung; Joseph Chao; Mark Wakabayashi; Benjamin Paz; Ernest Han; Paul Lin; Lucille Leong; Amy Hakim; Mary Carroll; Neal Prakash; Thanh Dellinger; Min Park; Robert J Morgan
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Safety of perioperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a pilot study of the clinical trial EudraCT 2016-004298-41.

Authors:  David Padilla-Valverde; Esther García-Santos; Susana Sanchez; Carmen Manzanares; Marta Rodriguez; Lucia González; Alfonso Ambrós; Juana M Cano; Leticia Serrano; Raquel Bodoque; Teresa Vergara; Jesus Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.