Literature DB >> 17316889

Low-dose CT: a useful and accessible tool for the early diagnosis of lung cancer in selected populations.

Luis Callol1, Francisco Roig, Alfredo Cuevas, Jose Ignacio de Granda, Francisco Villegas, Javier Jareño, Eva Arias, Jose M Albiach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An evaluation is made of the effectiveness of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in diagnosing early stage lung cancer in the Autonomous Community of Madrid (Spain).
METHODS: The study comprised subjects over 50 years of age who were active smokers (or who had stopped smoking up to 6 months previously) who smoked more than 30 cigarettes daily for at least 15 years, or 20 cigarettes daily for 20 years, or more than 10packs/year and in contact with asbestos at work. The study group was evaluated using LDCT. For all participants in whom LDCT showed no pathological findings, or in those cases classified as benign, a new LDCT scan was performed 2 years after the first. In case of doubt regarding the benign nature of the findings, an assessment algorithm was applied.
RESULTS: Among the initial 482 candidates in the study group, 466 LDCT scans were performed at baseline, revealing 9 extrapulmonary lesions and 114 pulmonary lesions in 98 subjects. The latter raised diagnostic doubts in 32 cases; of these, 15 were confirmed as benign by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). In the remaining 17 cases, stage IAp adenocarcinoma was diagnosed at baseline (0.2%). With LDCT after 2 years, an additional four adenocarcinomas were diagnosed-all in stage IAp (0.98%). The complete study, including prevalence cut-off and incidence calculation after 2 years, resulted in the diagnosis of five cancers (1.1%) and two false positive cases (28%).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of low-dose computed tomography in risk groups is valid for the early diagnosis of bronchogenic cancer. Nevertheless, significant problems remain, particularly those associated with false positive interpretations. The results of randomized studies on lung cancer mortality such as the US NLST trial and the Dutch-Belgian NELSON trial have to be awaited before any conclusion regarding the effectiveness of LDCT screening can be drawn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17316889     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  14 in total

1.  Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy in combination with PET-CT and rapid on-site cytopathologic examination for diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions.

Authors:  Bernd Lamprecht; Peter Porsch; Christian Pirich; Michael Studnicka
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Characterization of Individuals Taking Part in Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening Program.

Authors:  Mariann Moizs; Gábor Bajzik; Zsuzsanna Lelovics; János Strausz; Marianna Rakvács; Péter Zádori; Árpád Kovács; Imre Repa
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Imaging-guided thoracoscopic resection of a ground-glass opacity lesion in a hybrid operating room equipped with a robotic C-arm CT system.

Authors:  Chen-Ping Hsieh; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Hsin-Yueh Fang; Yin-Kai Chao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Recognition of "aggressive" behavior in "indolent" ground glass opacity and mixed density lesions.

Authors:  Junyan Zha; Dong Xie; Huikang Xie; Liping Zhang; Fangyu Zhou; Pengqing Ying; Lilan Zhao; Gening Jiang; Ke Fei; Chang Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Joshua N Mirkin; Thomas K Oliver; Christopher G Azzoli; Donald A Berry; Otis W Brawley; Tim Byers; Graham A Colditz; Michael K Gould; James R Jett; Anita L Sabichi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Douglas E Wood; Amir Qaseem; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Bronchoscopically obtained volatile biomarkers in lung cancer.

Authors:  Kaid Darwiche; Joerg Ingo Baumbach; Urte Sommerwerck; Helmut Teschler; Lutz Freitag
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 7.  Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Peter J Mazzone; David P Naidich; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Lobectomy vs. sublobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fang Lv; Bing Wang; Qi Xue; Shugeng Gao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

9.  Executive Summary: Screening for Lung Cancer: Chest Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.