Literature DB >> 1731671

Gastric substitution for resectable carcinoma of the esophagus: an analysis of 368 cases.

L S Wang1, M H Huang, B S Huang, K Y Chien.   

Abstract

Between 1974 and 1984, 1,188 patients with esophageal malignancies were treated in the Division of Thoracic Surgery of Veterans General Hospital, Taipei. The rate of resectability was 42.6%. Since 1974, the stomach has been used as esophageal substitute, and through 1984, a total of 368 patients were collected. The routes of reconstruction included retrosternal (77.2%), posteromediastinal (7.1%), and intrathoracic (15.7%). The rates of postoperative complications and surgical mortality in these 368 patients were 26.3% and 6.5%, respectively. Leakage of anastomosis was the most frequent complication. The incidence of stricture of esophagogastrostomy was 25.5%. All strictures were relieved by esophageal dilations. An average of 3.9 esophageal dilations were performed per patient (range, 1 to 15). Radical lymph node dissection was not routinely performed in our series. The actuarial 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 26.4% and 7.6%, respectively. Among 76 patients undergoing cervical esophagogastrostomy and surviving for more than 1 year, late complications occurred as follows: acid/bile regurgitation, 46.1%; postprandial fullness of abdomen, 38.2%; dumping syndrome, 13.2%; distended stomach with dyspnea, 11.8%; aspiration pneumonia, 6.6%; and gastric ulcer, 6.6%. Moreover, compared with patients without pyloroplasty, those with pyloroplasty were found to have a higher incidence of bile regurgitation (55.5% versus 8.6%), dumping syndrome (33.3% versus 6.9%), aspiration pneumonia (16.7% versus 3.4%), and gastric ulcer (22.2% versus 1.7%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1731671     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)91335-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

1.  Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction.

Authors:  Iraklis E Katsoulis; Ioannis Robotis; Grigorios Kouraklis; Panagiotis Yannopoulos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Late presentation of gastric tube ulcer perforation after oesophageal atresia repair.

Authors:  Eric J Hazebroek; Frans W J Hazebroek; Steven Leibman; Garett S Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Comparison of pyloric intervention strategies at the time of esophagectomy: is more better?

Authors:  Mara B Antonoff; Varun Puri; Bryan F Meyers; Kevin Baumgartner; Jennifer M Bell; Stephen Broderick; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; G Alexander Patterson; Traves D Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Gastric tube perforation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ubukata; Takeshi Nakachi; Takanobu Tabuchi; Hiroyuki Nagata; Akira Takemura; Jiro Shimazaki; Satoru Konishi; Takafumi Tabuchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Reliability and validity of a new scale to assess postoperative dysfunction after resection of upper gastrointestinal carcinoma.

Authors:  Misuzu Nakamura; Yoshihiro Kido; Masahiko Yano; Yoshinori Hosoya
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Minimal invasive approach of gastric and esophageal mobilization in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: total laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  S K H Wong; A C W Chan; D W H Lee; E W H To; E K W Ng; S C S Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Duodenogastroesophageal reflux in a patient with postoperative esophageal cancer shown on Tc-99m tetrofosmin raw data images of dual-isotope gated cardiac SPECT.

Authors:  Wei-Jen Shih; Primo P Milan
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Operable esophageal carcinoma: current results from Hong Kong.

Authors:  M Fok; S Y Law; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Anastomosis.

Authors:  R Bardini; M Asolati; A Ruol; L Bonavina; S Baseggio; A Peracchia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Gastric Conduit Perforation: A Late Fatal Complication after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Aditya A Kulkarni; Vivek Chauhan; Vishal Sharma; Harjeet Singh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.