Literature DB >> 17312412

"Between the fixed and the changing": examining and comparing reliability and validity of 3 sedation-agitation measuring scales.

Michal Rassin1, Ronit Sruyah, Ayelet Kahalon, Reut Naveh, Irit Nicar, Dina Silner.   

Abstract

The goal of the study was to compare the reliability and validity of 3 Sedation Agitation Scale. Two nurses and a physician conducted 130 observations simultaneously. They found an excellent interrater reliability in the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (r>0.86), and high correlations between the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and the Sedation Agitation Scale and Visual Analog Scale scales (r=0.92, r=0.85). The research findings will help to assert Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale as a daily assessment tool in the intensive care unit, and it will pave the way for construction a sedation protocol according to the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale level.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17312412     DOI: 10.1097/00003465-200703000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dimens Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0730-4625


  7 in total

1.  Comparison and agreement between the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale in evaluating patients' eligibility for delirium assessment in the ICU.

Authors:  Babar A Khan; Oscar Guzman; Noll L Campbell; Todd Walroth; Jason L Tricker; Siu L Hui; Anthony Perkins; Mohammed Zawahiri; John D Buckley; Mark O Farber; E Wesley Ely; Malaz A Boustani
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Actigraphy: analyzing patient movement.

Authors:  Mary Jo Grap; Virginia A Hamilton; Ann McNallen; Jessica M Ketchum; Al M Best; Nyimas Y Isti Arief; Paul A Wetzel
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  Entropy correlates with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Authors:  Ankur Sharma; Preet Mohinder Singh; Anjan Trikha; Vimi Rewari
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of infarction-related cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  M Buerke; H Lemm; S Dietz; K Werdan
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Comparison of arm and calf automatic noninvasive blood pressures in pediatric intensive care patients.

Authors:  Kathleen Schell; Eileen Briening; Ruth Lebet; Kelly Pruden; Steven Rawheiser; Barbara Jackson
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.145

Review 6.  New approaches to therapy of cancers of the stomach, colon and pancreas based on peptide analogs.

Authors:  A V Schally; K Szepeshazi; A Nagy; A M Comaru-Schally; G Halmos
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Predictors of agitation in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Ruth S Burk; Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Christine M Schubert; Curtis N Sessler
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.228

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.