Literature DB >> 24122077

Entropy correlates with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Ankur Sharma, Preet Mohinder Singh, Anjan Trikha, Vimi Rewari.   

Abstract

Sedation is routinely used in intensive care units. However due to absence of objective scoring systems like Bispectral Index and entropy our ability to regulate the degree of sedation is limited. This deficiency is further highlighted by the fact that agitation scores used in intensive care units (ICU) have no role in paralyzed patients. The present study compares entropy as a sedation scoring modality with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients in an ICU. Twenty-seven, mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients of either sex, 16-65 years of age, were studied over a period of 24 h. They received a standard sedation regimen consisting of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 lg/kg followed by infusions of propofol and fentanyl ranging from 1.5 to 5 mg/kg/h and 0.5 to 2.0 lg/kg/h, respectively. Clinically relevant values of RASS for optimal ICU sedation (between 0 and -3) in non-paralyzed patients were compared to corresponding entropy values, to find if any significant correlation exists between the two. These entropy measurements were obtained using the Datex-Ohmeda-M-EntropyTM module. This module is presently not approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for monitoring sedation in ICU. A total of 527 readings were obtained. There was a statistically significant correlation between the state entropy (SE) and RASS [Spearman's rho/rs = 0.334, p\0.0001]; response entropy (RE) and RASS [Spearman's rho/rs = 0.341, p\0.0001]). For adequate sedation as judged by a RASS value of 0 to -3, the mean SE was 57.86 ± 16.50 and RE was 67.75 ± 15.65. The present study illustrates that entropy correlates with RASS (between scores 0 and -3) when assessing the level of sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24122077     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9517-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  40 in total

1.  [The validation of C-POT (Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool) scale: a tool for assessing pain in intensive care patients].

Authors:  Francesca Stefani; Giuseppe Nardon; Raffaele Bonato; Anna Modenese; Chiara Novello; Renata Ferrari
Journal:  Assist Inferm Ric       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.804

2.  Description of the Entropy algorithm as applied in the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module.

Authors:  H Viertiö-Oja; V Maja; M Särkelä; P Talja; N Tenkanen; H Tolvanen-Laakso; M Paloheimo; A Vakkuri; A Yli-Hankala; P Meriläinen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Bispectral index correlates well with Richmond agitation sedation scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Authors:  Kunal Karamchandani; Vimi Rewari; Anjan Trikha; Ravinder Kumar Batra
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Effect of epidural neuraxial blockade-dependent sedation on the Ramsay Sedation Scale and the composite auditory evoked potentials index in surgical intensive care patients.

Authors:  Chueng-He Lu; Jia-Lin Chen; Ching-Tang Wu; Wen-Jinn Liaw; Chun-Chang Yeh; Chen-Hwan Cherng; Chih-Shung Wong
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Isoflurane and sevoflurane decrease entropy indices more than halothane at equal MAC values.

Authors:  Hemanshu Prabhakar; Zulfiqar Ali; Parmod K Bithal; Girija P Rath; Deepak Singh; Hari H Dash
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Adaptation to the Intensive Care Environment (ATICE): development and validation of a new sedation assessment instrument.

Authors:  Bernard De Jonghe; Deborah Cook; Lauren Griffith; Corinne Appere-de-Vecchi; Gordon Guyatt; Valérie Théron; Annick Vagnerre; Hervé Outin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  How reliable is the Bispectral Index in critically ill patients? A prospective, comparative, single-blinded observer study.

Authors:  Stanley A Nasraway SA; Eugene C Wu; Ruth M Kelleher; Cynthia M Yasuda; Anne M Donnelly
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Patient State Index (PSI) measures depth of sedation in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Gerhard Schneider; Susanne Heglmeier; Jürgen Schneider; Gunter Tempel; Eberhard F Kochs
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers.

Authors:  David Jean Biau; Brigitte M Jolles; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The addition of haloperidol, propofol, or midazolam to sufentanil for intravenous sedation in the intensive care unit using bispectral index.

Authors:  Baris Tukenmez; Dilek Memis; Zafer Pamukcu
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Makam S Harsha; Pradeep K Bhatia; Ankur Sharma; Priyanka Sethi
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.