Literature DB >> 17312210

Sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: a comparison with neostigmine-glycopyrrolate and edrophonium-atropine.

Ozlem Sacan1, Paul F White, Burcu Tufanogullari, Kevin Klein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is a modified [gamma] cyclodextrin compound, which encapsulates rocuronium to provide for a rapid reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade. We tested the hypothesis that sugammadex would provide for a more rapid reversal of a moderately profound residual rocuronium-induced blockade than the commonly used cholinesterase inhibitors, edrophonium and neostigmine.
METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing elective surgery procedures with a standardized desflurane-remifentanil-rocuronium anesthetic technique received either sugammadex, 4 mg/kg IV (n = 20), edrophonium, 1 mg/kg IV and atropine, 10 microg/kg IV (n = 20), or neostigmine, 70 microg/kg IV and glycopyrrolate, 14 microg/kg IV (n = 20) for reversal of neuromuscular blockade at 15 min or longer after the last dose of rocuronium using acceleromyography to record the train-of-four (TOF) responses. Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate values were recorded immediately before and for 30 min after reversal drug administration. Side effects were noted at discharge from the postanesthesia care unit.
RESULTS: The three groups were similar with respect to their demographic characteristics and total dosages of rocuronium prior to administering the study medication. Although the initial twitch heights (T1) at the time of reversal were similar in all three groups, the time to achieve TOF ratios of 0.7 and 0.9 were significantly shorter with sugammadex (71 +/- 25 and 107 +/- 61 s) than edrophonium (202 +/- 171 and 331 +/- 27 s) or neostigmine (625 +/- 341 and 1044 +/- 590 s). All patients in the sugammadex group achieved a TOF ratio of 0.9 < or =5 min after reversal administration compared with none and 5% in the edrophonium and neostigmine groups, respectively. Heart rate values at 2 and 5 min after reversal were significantly higher in the neostigmine-glycopyrrolate group compared with that in sugammadex. Finally, the incidence of dry mouth was significantly reduced in the sugammadex group (5% vs 85% and 95% in the neostigmine and edrophonium groups, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Sugammadex, 4 mg/kg IV, more rapidly and effectively reversed residual neuromuscular blockade when compared with neostigmine (70 microg/kg IV) and edrophonium (1 mg/kg IV). Use of sugammadex was associated with less frequent dry mouth than that with the currently used reversal drug combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17312210     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000248224.42707.48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  41 in total

1.  A case of atrioventricular block (Wenckebach type) induced by sugammadex.

Authors:  Yoshimune Osaka; Naho Shimada; Masaaki Satou; Takahiro Masuda; Takeshi Ando; Yuuki Kozono; Muneaki Shimada
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Efficacy of different doses of sugammadex after continuous infusion of rocuronium.

Authors:  Diego Soto Mesa; Mounir Fayad Fayad; Laura Pérez Arviza; Verónica Del Valle Ruiz; Fernando Cosío Carreño; Luis Arguelles Tamargo; Manuel Amorín Díaz; Sergio Fernández-Pello Montes
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 3.  [Sugammadex. New pharmacological concept for antagonizing rocuronium and vecuronium].

Authors:  H J Sparr; L H Booij; T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Update on muscle relaxation : What comes after succinylcholine, rocuronium and sugammadex?]

Authors:  N Zoremba; G Schälte; C Bruells; F K Pühringer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults.

Authors:  Ana-Marija Hristovska; Patricia Duch; Mikkel Allingstrup; Arash Afshari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-14

6.  Sugammadex.

Authors:  Dennis J Cada; Terri L Levien; Danial E Baker
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-07

Review 7.  Sugammadex: a review of its use in anaesthetic practice.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Unwarranted administration of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors can impair genioglossus and diaphragm muscle function.

Authors:  Matthias Eikermann; Philipp Fassbender; Atul Malhotra; Masaya Takahashi; Shigeto Kubo; Amy S Jordan; Shiva Gautam; David P White; Nancy L Chamberlin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Anaesthesia Management and Use of Sugammadex in a Patient with Ullrich's Disease.

Authors:  Emre Erbabacan; Güniz M Köksal; Tuğçe Barça Şeker; Birsel Ekici; Rahsan Özcan; Fatiş Altindaş
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-08-21

10.  Discovery, development, and clinical application of sugammadex sodium, a selective relaxant binding agent.

Authors:  Mark Welliver; John McDonough; Nicholas Kalynych; Robert Redfern
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.