Literature DB >> 17312064

MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement.

Hiroshi Kondo1, Masayuki Kanematsu, Satoshi Goshima, Toshiharu Miyoshi, Yoshimune Shiratori, Minoru Onozuka, Noriyuki Moriyama, Kyongtae T Bae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal MDCT scanning delay for peripancreatic arterial, pancreatic parenchymal, peripancreatic venous, and hepatic parenchymal contrast enhancement with a bolus-tracking technique. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three-phase 8-MDCT of the pancreas was performed on 170 patients after administration of 2 mL/kg of 300 mg I/mL contrast medium injected at 4 mL/s to a total dose of 150 mL. Patients were prospectively randomized into three groups with different scanning delays for the three phases (arterial, pancreatic, and venous) after bolus tracking was triggered at 50 H of aortic contrast enhancement: group 1 (5, 20, 45 seconds); group 2 (10, 25, 50 seconds); and group 3 (15, 30, 55 seconds). Mean attenuation values of the abdominal aorta, superior mesenteric artery, pancreatic parenchyma, splenic vein, superior mesenteric vein, portal vein, and hepatic parenchyma were measured. Increases in attenuation values after contrast administration were assessed as change in attenuation value. Qualitative analysis also was performed.
RESULTS: Mean contrast enhancement in the aorta (change in attenuation, 321-327 H) and the superior mesenteric artery (change in attenuation, 304-307 H) approached peak enhancement 5-10 seconds after bolus tracking was triggered. Pancreatic parenchyma became most intensely enhanced (change in attenuation, 84-85 H) 15-20 seconds after triggering, and then the enhancement gradually decreased. Enhancement of the splenic vein and portal vein peaked 25 seconds and that of the superior mesenteric vein peaked 30 seconds after triggering. Liver parenchyma reached 52 H 30 seconds after triggering and reached a plateau (change in attenuation, 58-61 H) at a further scanning delay of 45-55 seconds. Qualitative results were in good agreement with quantitative results.
CONCLUSION: For the injection protocol used in this study, optimal scanning delay after triggering of bolus tracking at 50 H of aortic contrast enhancement was 5-10 seconds for the peripancreatic arterial phase, 15-20 seconds for the pancreatic parenchymal phase, and 45-55 seconds for the hepatic parenchymal phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17312064     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

1.  Correlation of abdominal fat ratio with hepatic CT enhancement.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Mu-Jie Guo; Yu-Fen Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Pancreatic neoplasia: a practical cross-sectional imaging primer for the nonradiologist.

Authors:  Matthew T Heller; Nathan Johnson; Antonio Fargiano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-06

3.  Sixty-four MDCT achieves higher contrast in pancreas with optimization of scan time delay.

Authors:  Tina Stuber; Hans-Jürgen Brambs; Wolfgang Freund; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-28

4.  Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and 120-kVp Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Priya Bhosale; Ott Le; Aprana Balachandran; Patricia Fox; Eric Paulson; Eric Tamm
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Dual-source, dual-energy multidetector CT for the evaluation of pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  A J Chu; J M Lee; Y J Lee; S K Moon; J K Han; B I Choi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  64-section multidetector CT of the upper abdomen: optimization of a saline chaser injection protocol for improved vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Antonino Guerrisi; Huiman Barnhart; Sebastian T Schindera; Roberto Passariello; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Optimized scan delay for late hepatic arterial or pancreatic parenchymal phase in dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography with bolus-tracking method.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Noda; Nobuyuki Kawai; Takuma Ishihara; Yoshiki Tsuboi; Tetsuro Kaga; Toshiharu Miyoshi; Fuminori Hyodo; Masayuki Matsuo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Establishment of optimal scan delay for multi-phase computed tomography using bolus-tracking technique in canine pancreas.

Authors:  Soo-Young Choi; Ho-Jung Choi; Ki-Ja Lee; Young-Won Lee
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 1.267

10.  Dual-layer spectral CT improves image quality of multiphasic pancreas CT in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yasunori Nagayama; Shota Tanoue; Taihei Inoue; Seitaro Oda; Takeshi Nakaura; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.