Literature DB >> 17311885

Arthrokinematics in a subgroup of patients likely to benefit from a lumbar stabilization exercise program.

Deydre S Teyhen1, Timothy W Flynn, John D Childs, Lawrence D Abraham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: A clinical prediction rule (CPR) has been reported to identify patients with low back pain who are likely to benefit from stabilization exercises. The aim of this study was to characterize the spinal motion, using digital fluoroscopic video, of a subgroup of subjects with low back pain.
SUBJECTS: Twenty subjects who were positive on the CPR were compared with 20 control subjects who were healthy.
METHODS: The magnitude and timing of lumbar sagittal-plane intersegmental angular and linear displacement were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curves and accuracy statistics were used to develop a kinematic model.
RESULTS: A 10-variable model was developed that could distinguish group membership. Seven of these variables described a disruption in timing of angular or linear displacement during mid-range movements. None of the variables suggested hypermobility. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that individuals with mid-range aberrant motion without signs of hypermobility are likely to benefit from these exercises. The developed model describes altered kinematics of this subgroup of subjects and helps to provide construct validity for the developed CPR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17311885     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  17 in total

1.  Measurement Performance of a Computer Assisted Vertebral Motion Analysis System.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; David C Lee; Chip Wade; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  Prescriptive clinical prediction rules in back pain research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen May; Richard Rosedale
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

3.  Kinematic analysis of dynamic lumbar motion in patients with lumbar segmental instability using digital videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Amir Ahmadi; Nader Maroufi; Hamid Behtash; Hajar Zekavat; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Intrasubject repeatability of in vivo intervertebral motion parameters using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Rebecca Hemming; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Uneven intervertebral motion sharing is related to disc degeneration and is greater in patients with chronic, non-specific low back pain: an in vivo, cross-sectional cohort comparison of intervertebral dynamics using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alan Breen; Alexander Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Anti-directional cervical intervertebral motion: could it have gone any other way?

Authors:  Alan Breen
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

7.  The use of "stabilization exercises" to affect neuromuscular control in the lumbopelvic region: a narrative review.

Authors:  Paul Bruno
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

8.  What Risk Factors Are Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in US Army Rangers? A Prospective Prognostic Study.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Scott W Shaffer; Robert J Butler; Stephen L Goffar; Kyle B Kiesel; Daniel I Rhon; Jared N Williamson; Phillip J Plisky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Modifying patterns of movement in people with low back pain -does it help? A systematic review.

Authors:  Robert A Laird; Peter Kent; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Identification of Risk Factors Prospectively Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in a Warrior Athlete Population.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Scott W Shaffer; Stephen L Goffar; Kyle Kiesel; Robert J Butler; Daniel I Rhon; Phillip J Plisky
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.