Literature DB >> 17311802

Application of genomic biomarkers to predict increased lung tumor incidence in 2-year rodent cancer bioassays.

Russell S Thomas1, Linda Pluta, Longlong Yang, Thomas A Halsey.   

Abstract

Rodent cancer bioassays are part of a legacy of safety testing that has not changed significantly over the past 30 years. The bioassays are expensive, time consuming, and use hundreds of animals. Fewer than 1500 chemicals have been tested in a rodent cancer bioassay compared to the thousands of environmental and industrial chemicals that remain untested for carcinogenic activity. In this study, we used existing data generated by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) to identify gene expression biomarkers that can predict results from a rodent cancer bioassay. A set of 13 diverse chemicals was selected from those tested by the NTP. Seven chemicals were positive for increased lung tumor incidence in female B6C3F1 mice and six were negative. Female mice were exposed subchronically to each of the 13 chemicals, and microarray analysis was performed on the lung. Statistical classification analysis using the gene expression profiles identified a set of eight probe sets corresponding to six genes whose expression correctly predicted the increase in lung tumor incidence with 93.9% accuracy. The sensitivity and specificity were 95.2 and 91.8%, respectively. Among the six genes in the predictive signature, most were enzymes involved in endogenous and xenobiotic metabolism, and one gene was a growth factor receptor involved in lung development. The results demonstrate that increases in chemically induced lung tumor incidence in female mice can be predicted using gene biomarkers from a subchronic exposure and may form the basis of a more efficient and economical approach for evaluating the carcinogenic activity of chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17311802     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  11 in total

Review 1.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Authors:  Brinda Mahadevan; Ronald D Snyder; Michael D Waters; R Daniel Benz; Raymond A Kemper; Raymond R Tice; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 2.  Comparison of toxicogenomics and traditional approaches to inform mode of action and points of departure in human health risk assessment of benzo[a]pyrene in drinking water.

Authors:  Ivy Moffat; Nikolai Chepelev; Sarah Labib; Julie Bourdon-Lacombe; Byron Kuo; Julie K Buick; France Lemieux; Andrew Williams; Sabina Halappanavar; Amal Malik; Mirjam Luijten; Jiri Aubrecht; Daniel R Hyduke; Albert J Fornace; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Drug discovery in psychiatric illness: mining for gold.

Authors:  Greg I Elmer; Neri Kafkafi
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Improving gene expression similarity measurement using pathway-based analytic dimension.

Authors:  Changwon Keum; Jung Hoon Woo; Won Seok Oh; Sue-Nie Park; Kyoung Tai No
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Functional analysis of multiple genomic signatures demonstrates that classification algorithms choose phenotype-related genes.

Authors:  W Shi; M Bessarabova; D Dosymbekov; Z Dezso; T Nikolskaya; M Dudoladova; T Serebryiskaya; A Bugrim; A Guryanov; R J Brennan; R Shah; J Dopazo; M Chen; Y Deng; T Shi; G Jurman; C Furlanello; R S Thomas; J C Corton; W Tong; L Shi; Y Nikolsky
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  A comparison of batch effect removal methods for enhancement of prediction performance using MAQC-II microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  J Luo; M Schumacher; A Scherer; D Sanoudou; D Megherbi; T Davison; T Shi; W Tong; L Shi; H Hong; C Zhao; F Elloumi; W Shi; R Thomas; S Lin; G Tillinghast; G Liu; Y Zhou; D Herman; Y Li; Y Deng; H Fang; P Bushel; M Woods; J Zhang
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Selecting a single model or combining multiple models for microarray-based classifier development?--a comparative analysis based on large and diverse datasets generated from the MAQC-II project.

Authors:  Minjun Chen; Leming Shi; Reagan Kelly; Roger Perkins; Hong Fang; Weida Tong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  RNA-Seq versus oligonucleotide array assessment of dose-dependent TCDD-elicited hepatic gene expression in mice.

Authors:  Rance Nault; Kelly A Fader; Tim Zacharewski
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Application of biclustering of gene expression data and gene set enrichment analysis methods to identify potentially disease causing nanomaterials.

Authors:  Andrew Williams; Sabina Halappanavar
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 10.  Critical role of toxicologic pathology in a short-term screen for carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Samuel M Cohen; Lora L Arnold
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.