Literature DB >> 17311376

Theoretical investigations on heteronuclear chalcogen-chalcogen interactions: on the nature of weak bonds between chalcogen centers.

Christian Bleiholder1, Rolf Gleiter, Daniel B Werz, Horst Köppel.   

Abstract

To understand the intermolecular interactions between chalcogen centers (O, S, Se, Te), quantum chemical calculations on model systems were carried out. These model systems were pairs of monomers of the composition (CH3)2X1 (X1 = O, S, Se, Te) as the donors and CH3X2Z (with X2 = O, S, Se, Te and Z = Me, CN) as the acceptors. The variation of X1, X2, and Z leads to 32 pairs with 8 homonuclear cases (X1 = X2 = O, S, Se, Te) and 24 heteronuclear cases (X1 not equal X2). The MP2/SDB-cc-pVTZ, 6-311G* level of theory was used to derive the geometrical parameters and the interaction energies of the model systems. The pairs with Z = CN (17-32) show a considerably higher interaction energy than the pairs with CH3 groups only (1-16). Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis revealed that the interaction of the dimers 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17, 21, 25, and 29 is mainly due to weak hydrogen bonding between methyl groups and chalcogen centers. These systems all contain hard chalcogen atoms as acceptors. For all other systems, the chalcogen-chalcogen interaction dominates. The one-electron picture of an interaction between the lone pair of the donor chalcogen atom and the chalcogen-carbon antibonding sigma* orbital serves as a model to qualitatively rationalize trends found in many of these systems. However, it has to be applied with some amount of skepticism. A detailed analysis based on symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) reveals that induction and dispersion forces dominate and contribute to the bonding in each case. Hydrogen-bonded compounds involve bonding electrostatic contributions. Compounds dominated by chalcogen-chalcogen interactions exhibit bonding due to electrostatic interactions only if one of the chalcogen atoms involved is sulfur or oxygen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17311376     DOI: 10.1021/ic062110y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  15 in total

1.  Chalcogen-bonded complexes. Selenium-bound adducts of NH3, H2O, PH3, and H2S with OCSe, SCSe, and CSe2.

Authors:  Ponnadurai Ramasami; Thomas A Ford
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Interplay between halogen and chalcogen bonding in the XCl∙∙∙OCS∙∙∙NH₃ (X = F, OH, NC, CN, and FCC) complex.

Authors:  Qiang Zhao
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Tripodal Binding Units for Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold: A Comparison of Thiol and Thioether Headgroups.

Authors:  Tobias Weidner; Nirmalya Ballav; Ulrich Siemeling; Dennis Troegel; Tim Walter; Reinhold Tacke; David G Castner; Michael Zharnikov
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Conformational analysis of a nitroxide side chain in an α-helix with density functional theory.

Authors:  Dora Toledo Warshaviak; Laura Serbulea; K N Houk; Wayne L Hubbell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Chalcogen- and halogen-bonds involving SX2 (X = F, Cl, and Br) with formaldehyde.

Authors:  Lixin Mo; Yanli Zeng; Xiaoyan Li; Xueying Zhang; Lingpeng Meng
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Carbonyl Activation by Selenium- and Tellurium-Based Chalcogen Bonding in a Michael Addition Reaction.

Authors:  Patrick Wonner; Tim Steinke; Lukas Vogel; Stefan M Huber
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  Chalcogen Bonding Catalysis of a Nitro-Michael Reaction.

Authors:  Patrick Wonner; Alexander Dreger; Lukas Vogel; Elric Engelage; Stefan M Huber
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 8.  On the Importance of Pnictogen and Chalcogen Bonding Interactions in Supramolecular Catalysis.

Authors:  Antonio Frontera; Antonio Bauza
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Simulating chalcogen bonding using molecular mechanics: a pseudoatom approach to model ebselen.

Authors:  Thomas Fellowes; Jonathan M White
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Molecular Hydrogen as a Lewis Base in Hydrogen Bonds and Other Interactions.

Authors:  Sławomir J Grabowski
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.