Literature DB >> 17308956

A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.

J A Cramer1, D T Gold, S L Silverman, E M Lewiecki.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Fourteen reports utilizing data from de-identified administrative databases were reviewed. Studies contained at least one measure of patient persistence or compliance with bisphosphonates or bisphosphonates and other anti-osteoporosis medications. These studies confirm that women with osteoporosis have suboptimal persistence and compliance rates with bisphosphonate therapy.
INTRODUCTION: This review summarizes patient persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.
METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE search for the period from January 1998 to May 2006, using a detailed list of terms related to persistence and compliance with anti-osteoporosis medications. Studies were included if they contained at least one measure of persistence or compliance derived from de-identified administrative databases containing patient demographics and prescription information.
RESULTS: We reviewed 14 reports, which described 14 databases. The percentage of patients persisting with therapy for 1 year ranged from 17.9% to 78.0%. Compliance, assessed as mean medication possession ratio (MPR), ranged from 0.59 to 0.81. When comparing compliance with weekly and daily bisphosphonates, the mean MPR was consistently higher for weekly versus daily therapy (0.58 to 0.76 versus 0.46 to 0.64 for patients receiving weekly and daily bisphosphonate therapy respectively). Persistence was also improved in patients receiving weekly bisphosphonates, assessed by both length of persistence (194 to 269 days [weekly] and 134 to 208 days [daily]) and percentage of persistent patients at the end of the follow-up period (35.7% to 69.7% [weekly] and 26.1% to 55.7% [daily]).
CONCLUSION: Although patients using weekly bisphosphonate medication follow their prescribed dosing regimens better than those using daily therapy, overall compliance and persistence rates were suboptimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17308956     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0322-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  31 in total

1.  Changes in QUS and BMD measurements with antiresorptive therapy: a two-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  M L Frost; G M Blake
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: one-year results from the dosing intravenous administration study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Silvano Adami; Cezary Strugala; Jacob A Stakkestad; Jean-Yves Reginster; Dieter Felsenberg; Claus Christiansen; Roberto Civitelli; Marc K Drezner; Robert R Recker; Michael Bolognese; Claire Hughes; Daiva Masanauskaite; Penelope Ward; Philip Sambrook; David M Reid
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-06

Review 3.  How many women have osteoporosis now?

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Compliance with osteoporosis medications.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Jerry Avorn; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Marilyn Arnold; Jennifer M Polinski; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-11-14

5.  Medication persistence with weekly versus daily doses of orally administered bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Mark P Ettinger; Rich Gallagher; Paul E MacCosbe
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  The effect of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal women: a comparison of studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.

Authors:  Joyce A Cramer; Niall O Lynch; Anne-Francoise Gaudin; Mel Walker; Warren Cowell
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Robert A Yood; Srinivas Emani; John I Reed; Barbara Edelman Lewis; Mary Charpentier; Eva Lydick
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McCombs; Patrick Thiebaud; Connie McLaughlin-Miley; Jinhai Shi
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Cristina S Hammond; Megan M Moncur; G Thomas Ray; Gwen M Hebert; Alice R Pressman; Bruce Ettinger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Patient preference for once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study.

Authors:  James A Simon; E Michael Lewiecki; Mary E Smith; Richard A Petruschke; Lixia Wang; Joanne J Palmisano
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  164 in total

1.  Secondary prevention program for osteoporotic fractures and long-term adherence to bisphosphonates.

Authors:  S Ojeda-Bruno; A Naranjo; F Francisco-Hernández; C Erausquin; I Rúa-Figueroa; J C Quevedo; C Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  New targets for intervention in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Exposure to oral bisphosphonates and risk of cancer.

Authors:  Chris R Cardwell; Christian C Abnet; Philip Veal; Carmel M Hughes; Marie M Cantwell; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  A meta-analysis of brief high-impact exercises for enhancing bone health in premenopausal women.

Authors:  O O Babatunde; J J Forsyth; C J Gidlow
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study.

Authors:  M S Cooper; A J Palmer; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Zoledronate treatment has different effects in mouse strains with contrasting baseline bone mechanical phenotypes.

Authors:  M W Aref; E M B McNerny; D Brown; K J Jepsen; M R Allen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone loss after oophorectomy among high-risk women: an NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hibler; James Kauderer; Mark H Greene; Gustavo C Rodriguez; David S Alberts
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Self-perception of fracture risk: what can it tell us?

Authors:  A E Litwic; J E Compston; A Wyman; E S Siris; S H Gehlbach; J D Adachi; R Chapurlat; A Díez-Pérez; A Z LaCroix; J W Nieves; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; K G Saag; S Silverman; N B Watts; S L Greenspan; L March; C L Gregson; C Cooper; E M Dennison
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis: insights for clinicians.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.