Literature DB >> 17308947

Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter (Stretta procedure) in patients with recurrent reflux after antireflux surgery: can surgery be avoided?

D A McClusky1, L Khaitan, V A Swafford, C D Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrent reflux following antireflux surgery (ARS) can be difficult to manage, especially in patients who also fail medical management. In these patients, redo ARS remains the only treatment option. Endoscopic radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter (the Stretta procedure; Stretta, Curon, Sunnyvale, CA) has been shown to significantly decreased symptom scores and improve quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the Stretta procedure in treating patients with recurrent reflux after fundoplication.
METHODS: Between March 2002 and December 2003, eight patients with recurrent reflux following ARS underwent the Stretta procedure. All patients were asked to complete an institutional symptom survey pre-Stretta and at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Patients rated 7 reflux-related symptoms (heartburn, dysphagia, regurgitation, cough, voice changes/hoarseness, asthma, chest pain) on a 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale. Data were analyzed using a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test where appropriate.
RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for seven of the eight patients, with a median follow-up of 253 days (range, 67-378 days). One patient was lost to follow-up and not included in our analysis. Symptom scores decreased significantly, with six patients noting both improved typical and atypical symptoms. Overall, six patients (85%) were satisfied with their results.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this small series, the Stretta procedure significantly reduces subjective symptoms of GERD. The Stretta procedure may serve an important role as an additional management strategy to help manage recurrent GERD after ARS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17308947     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9195-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.

Authors:  J G Hunter; C D Smith; G D Branum; J P Waring; T L Trus; M Cornwell; K Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  N J Soper; D Dunnegan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The nationwide frequency of major adverse outcomes in antireflux surgery and the role of surgeon experience, 1992-1997.

Authors:  David R Flum; Thomas Koepsell; Patrick Heagerty; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junction for the treatment of GERD.

Authors:  G Triadafilopoulos; J K Dibaise; T T Nostrant; N H Stollman; P K Anderson; S A Edmundowicz; D O Castell; M S Kim; J C Rabine; D S Utley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Surgical therapy for GERD: selection of procedures, short- and long-term results.

Authors:  R A Hinder
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 6.  Oesophageal disorders: future developments.

Authors:  William Tam; John Dent
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.043

7.  Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations?

Authors:  S Horgan; D Pohl; D Bogetti; T Eubanks; C Pellegrini
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-08

8.  The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: 6 and 12 month follow-up of the U.S. open label trial.

Authors:  George Triadafilopoulos; John K DiBaise; Timothy T Nostrant; Neil H Stollman; Paul K Anderson; M Michael Wolfe; Richard I Rothstein; John M Wo; Douglas A Corley; Marco G Patti; Louis V Antignano; John S Goff; Steven A Edmundowicz; Donald O Castell; John C Rabine; Michael S Kim; David S Utley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies.

Authors:  H J Stein; H Feussner; J R Siewert
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the lower oesophageal sphincter and gastric cardia inhibits transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease.

Authors:  W C E Tam; M N Schoeman; Q Zhang; J Dent; R Rigda; D Utley; R H Holloway
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  4 in total

1.  Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter improves gastroesophageal reflux patient-reported outcomes in failed laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication cohort.

Authors:  Mark Noar; Patrick Squires; Sulman Khan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease using multiple Plicator implants: 12-month multicenter study results.

Authors:  D von Renteln; I Schiefke; K H Fuchs; S Raczynski; M Philipper; W Breithaupt; K Caca; H Neuhaus
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluating outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness plication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with impedance monitoring.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Arthur Schmidt; Bettina Riecken; Karel Caca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Long-Term Results of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery for the Treatment of GERD: Results of a Prospective 48-Month Study.

Authors:  Luca Dughera; Monica Navino; Paola Cassolino; Mariella De Cento; Luca Cacciotella; Fabio Cisarò; Michele Chiaverina
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2011-10-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.