Literature DB >> 17308730

Unwanted fertility among the poor: an inequity?

Duff Gillespie1, Saifuddin Ahmed, Amy Tsui, Scott Radloff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if higher fertility and lower contraceptive use among the poorer segments of society should be considered an inequality, reflecting a higher desire for large families among the poor, or an inequity, a product of the poor being prevented from achieving their desired fertility to the same degree as wealthier segments of society.
METHODS: Using the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys from 41 countries, we analysed the differences in fertility in light of modern contraceptive use, unwanted fertility (defined as actual fertility in excess of desired fertility) and the availability of family planning services found among poorer and wealthier segments of society. The asset index in each survey was used to construct wealth quintiles and the concentration index (CI) of income inequality was found in health variables.
FINDINGS: The relationship between the CI found in the total fertility rate and the use of contraceptives was linear, R-square of 0.289. Unwanted births in the poorest quintile were more than twice that found in the wealthiest quintile, respectively 1.2 and 0.5, although there was wide variation among the 41 countries. The CI in our measure of family planning availability (radio messages, knowledge of services and contact with field workers) was largely positively associated with the CI in modern contraceptive prevalence, respectively R-squares of 0.392, 0.692 and 0.526.
CONCLUSION: In many countries the higher fertility and lower contraceptive use found among poorer relative to wealthier populations should be considered an inequity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17308730      PMCID: PMC2636279          DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.033829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  10 in total

Review 1.  Equity and equality in health and health care.

Authors:  A J Culyer; A Wagstaff
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Reproductive health and the Millennium Development Goals: the missing link.

Authors:  Barbara Crossette
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2005-03

3.  Achieving universal coverage with health interventions.

Authors:  Cesar G Victora; Kara Hanson; Jennifer Bryce; J Patrick Vaughan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 23-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Missing female births in India.

Authors:  Shirish S Sheth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The concepts and principles of equity and health.

Authors:  M Whitehead
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.663

Review 6.  Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement.

Authors:  Paula Braveman
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 7.  Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do?

Authors:  D R Gwatkin
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 8.  Which delivery systems reach the poor? A review of equity of coverage of ever-treated nets, never-treated nets, and immunisation to reduce child mortality in Africa.

Authors:  Jayne Webster; Jo Lines; Jane Bruce; Joanna Rm Armstrong Schellenberg; Kara Hanson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  New evidence on birth spacing: promising findings for improving newborn, infant, child, and maternal health.

Authors:  M Norton
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough.

Authors:  Cesar G Victora; Adam Wagstaff; Joanna Armstrong Schellenberg; Davidson Gwatkin; Mariam Claeson; Jean-Pierre Habicht
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  26 in total

1.  Inequity and unwanted fertility in developing countries.

Authors:  Iqbal H Shah; Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Assessing gaps and poverty-related inequalities in the public and private sector family planning supply environment of urban Nigeria.

Authors:  Jessica K Levy; Sian Curtis; Catherine Zimmer; Ilene S Speizer
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Comparing private sector family planning services to government and NGO services in Ethiopia and Pakistan: how do social franchises compare across quality, equity and cost?

Authors:  Nirali M Shah; Wenjuan Wang; David M Bishai
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.344

4.  The sensitivity of measures of unwanted and unintended pregnancy using retrospective and prospective reporting: evidence from Malawi.

Authors:  Sara Yeatman; Christie Sennott
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

5.  Explaining inequity in the use of institutional delivery services in selected countries.

Authors:  Mai Do; Rieza Soelaeman; David R Hotchkiss
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-04

6.  Frustrated demand for sterilization among low-income Latinas in El Paso, Texas.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Sarah McKinnon; Michele G Shedlin; Jon Amastae; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-10-11

7.  Low use of contraception among poor women in Africa: an equity issue.

Authors:  Andreea A Creanga; Duff Gillespie; Sabrina Karklins; Amy O Tsui
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Economic status, education and empowerment: implications for maternal health service utilization in developing countries.

Authors:  Saifuddin Ahmed; Andreea A Creanga; Duff G Gillespie; Amy O Tsui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relationship characteristics and contraceptive use among couples in urban kenya.

Authors:  Laili Irani; Ilene S Speizer; Jean-Christophe Fotso
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-03

10.  Factors determining family planning in Catalonia. Sources of inequity.

Authors:  Carme Saurina; Laura Vall-Llosera; Marc Saez
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.