Literature DB >> 16253888

Which delivery systems reach the poor? A review of equity of coverage of ever-treated nets, never-treated nets, and immunisation to reduce child mortality in Africa.

Jayne Webster1, Jo Lines, Jane Bruce, Joanna Rm Armstrong Schellenberg, Kara Hanson.   

Abstract

Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and childhood vaccination are two of the most powerful interventions available to prevent childhood mortality in Africa, but ITN coverage is still very low. Current debates about how to increase ITN coverage are concerned with the roles of different supply and delivery systems, in particular whether or not commercial net markets have any useful role. Here, we review data available on coverage and equity of coverage of three interventions to prevent childhood mortality. We compiled and analysed data from nationally representative surveys in 26 African countries to compare equity of coverage of (1) the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI), (2) any net, (3) ever-treated nets (ie, ITNs), and (4) never-treated nets (ie, untreated nets; UTNs). We assumed that ever-treated net coverage mostly reflects the activities of public-health programmes and projects, and that never-treated net coverage mostly reflects the activity of local unsubsidised commercial markets. We discuss the validity, limitations, and possible biases of these assumptions. We estimate that 87% of the 8.4 million children protected by nets used UTNs. We used the concentration index (CI) to assess equity of coverage of the interventions. The data shows that never-treated net coverage is surprisingly equitable: overall, and despite substantial regional variations, it is comparable in equity to EPI (median CI(UTN)=0.166, CI(EPI)=0.075; p=0.3). In almost all countries, coverage of ITNs is strongly concentrated in the least poor households, and significantly more inequitable than both UTNs (median CI(ITN)=0.435, mean CI(UTN)=0.158; p<0.001) and EPI (median CI(ITN)=0.435, CI(EPI)=0.075; p<0.001). These results suggest that the public-health value of commercial net markets has been greatly underestimated, and that these markets have so far contributed more to equitable and sustainable coverage of mosquito nets, and hence to the prevention of malaria in Africa, than have the ITNs delivered by public-health systems and projects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253888     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70269-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  43 in total

1.  Unwanted fertility among the poor: an inequity?

Authors:  Duff Gillespie; Saifuddin Ahmed; Amy Tsui; Scott Radloff
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Fairness and legitimacy of decisions during delivery of malaria services and ITN interventions in Zambia.

Authors:  Mary Tuba; Ingvild F Sandoy; Paul Bloch; Jens Byskov
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.979

3.  Is the scale up of malaria intervention coverage also achieving equity?

Authors:  Richard W Steketee; Thomas P Eisele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Towards achieving Abuja targets: identifying and addressing barriers to access and use of insecticides treated nets among the poorest populations in Kenya.

Authors:  Jane Chuma; Vincent Okungu; Janet Ntwiga; Catherine Molyneux
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention.

Authors:  Jayne Webster; Daniel Chandramohan; Kara Hanson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Possession and usage of insecticidal bed nets among the people of Uganda: is BRAC Uganda Health Programme pursuing a pro-poor path?

Authors:  Syed Masud Ahmed; Abebual Zerihun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Which family members use the best nets? An analysis of the condition of mosquito nets and their distribution within households in Tanzania.

Authors:  Angela Tsuang; Jo Lines; Kara Hanson
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Assessment of a national voucher scheme to deliver insecticide-treated mosquito nets to pregnant women.

Authors:  Tanya Marchant; David Schellenberg; Rose Nathan; Joanna Armstrong-Schellenberg; Hadji Mponda; Caroline Jones; Yovitha Sedekia; Jane Bruce; Kara Hanson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The use of insecticide treated nets by age: implications for universal coverage in Africa.

Authors:  Abdisalan M Noor; Viola C Kirui; Simon J Brooker; Robert W Snow
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Malaria control under the Taliban regime: insecticide-treated net purchasing, coverage, and usage among men and women in eastern Afghanistan.

Authors:  Natasha Howard; Ahmad Shafi; Caroline Jones; Mark Rowland
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.