Literature DB >> 17308474

Center of rotation affects abduction range of motion of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Sergio Gutiérrez1, Jonathan C Levy, William E Lee, Tony S Keller, Murray E Maitland.   

Abstract

Although clinical outcomes of the reverse shoulder replacement have noted improvements in pain and function, evaluation of these outcomes reveals concerns regarding progressive scapular notching and variability of functional improvements in range of motion. Therefore, an apparatus was designed to examine differences in abduction range of motion for seven configurations of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. An electronic goniometer was used to measure abduction range of motion, and digital video analysis was used to determine impingement points. Finally, a correlation analysis between range of motion and the effect of changing the center of rotation of the glenosphere was performed. As the center of rotation was moved more lateral from the glenoid, abduction range of motion increased. The greatest range of motion was 97 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees using a glenoid component with a center of rotation offset 10 mm +/- 0.4 mm from the glenoid. The smallest range of motion was 67 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees using a glenosphere with a center of rotation offset 0.5 mm +/- 0.1 mm from the glenoid surface. Range of motion always was limited by impingement points on the scapula. Inferiorly, adduction was limited by impingement on either the inferior scapular border or the glenoid. Superiorly, abduction was limited by impingement on the acromion. A positive linear correlation was found between abduction range of motion and center of rotation offset relative to the glenoid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17308474     DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803d0f57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

Review 1.  Grammont's idea: The story of Paul Grammont's functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Baulot; François Sirveaux; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Hierarchy of stability factors in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Tony S Keller; Jonathan C Levy; William E Lee; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  How reverse shoulder arthroplasty works.

Authors:  Matthew Walker; Jordan Brooks; Matthew Willis; Mark Frankle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: research models.

Authors:  Stefano Petrillo; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Alessandra Berton; Andreas Kontaxis; Timothy Wright; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

6.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice.

Authors:  Jean-David Werthel; Gilles Walch; Emilie Vegehan; Pierric Deransart; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Philippe Valenti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

9.  Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti; Jean Kany; Kamil Elkholti; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Lieven F de Wilde; Didier Poncet; Bart Middernacht; Anders Ekelund
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.