Literature DB >> 17307978

Clinical pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with lower respiratory tract infections.

Chonghua Li1, Xiaoli Du, Joseph L Kuti, David P Nicolau.   

Abstract

Studies of beta-lactam pharmacodynamics in infected patients are sparse. In this study, classification and regression tree (CART) and logistic regression analyses were used to identify which pharmacodynamic indices and magnitudes were significant predictors of meropenem efficacy for 101 adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Using demographic data, a validated population pharmacokinetic model was employed to predict pharmacokinetic parameters and free serum concentrations in the studied patients. Pharmacodynamic indices [percentage of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the MIC (% fT > MIC), f(maximum concentration of drug in serum) (fC(max))/MIC, fC(min)/MIC, and f(area under the concentration-time curve) (fAUC)/MIC] were calculated based on the baseline pathogen with the highest drug MIC for each patient. The median (range) of percent fT > MIC, fC(max)/MIC, fC(min)/MIC, and fAUC/MIC were 100% (0 to 100%), 728.8 (0.8 to 15,777), 19.9 (0.01 to 278), and 3,605.4 (2.7 to 60,865.9), respectively. CART identified the following breakpoints as significant predictors for microbiological response: >54% fT > MIC, a fC(max)/MIC > 383, and a fC(min)/MIC > 5; fC(min)/MIC > 5 was the only significant predictor of clinical response. Due to 100% fT > MIC achieved in the majority of LRTI patients, fC(min)/MIC was the statistically significant parameter associated with meropenem clinical and microbiological response in the adults with LRTI. The findings for LRTI patients can be applied to optimize meropenem dose regimens to achieve clinical success and microbiological eradication in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307978      PMCID: PMC1855547          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00294-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  18 in total

1.  Correlation of meropenem plasma levels with pharmacodynamic requirements in critically ill patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Krueger; Gertraud Neeser; Harald Schuster; Torsten H Schroeder; Edgar Hoffmann; Alexandra Heininger; Hans-Juergen Dieterich; Helmuth Forst; Klaus E Unertl
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.544

2.  Prevention of resistance: a goal for dose selection for antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  G L Drusano
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections.

Authors:  Vincent H Tam; Peggy S McKinnon; Ronda L Akins; Michael J Rybak; George L Drusano
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Xiaoli Du; Chonghua Li; Joseph L Kuti; Charles H Nightingale; David P Nicolau
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  P G Ambrose; D M Grasela; T H Grasela; J Passarell; H B Mayer; P F Pierce
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. Meropenem Serious Infection Study Group.

Authors:  F Colardyn; K L Faulkner
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during continuous and intermittent infusion of ceftazidime in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  J W Mouton; J G den Hollander
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Serum bactericidal activities and comparative pharmacokinetics of meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin.

Authors:  M Dreetz; J Hamacher; J Eller; K Borner; P Koeppe; T Schaberg; H Lode
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of meropenem in adult patients.

Authors:  Chonghua Li; Joseph L Kuti; Charles H Nightingale; David P Nicolau
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 10.  Meropenem. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; A J Wagstaff; R N Brogden; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.546

View more
  86 in total

1.  Should IV Antibiotics Be Administered by Prolonged Infusion?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2010-05

2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Ross Norris; David L Paterson; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Understanding PK/PD.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  The role of infection models and PK/PD modelling for optimising care of critically ill patients with severe infections.

Authors:  T Tängdén; V Ramos Martín; T W Felton; E I Nielsen; S Marchand; R J Brüggemann; J B Bulitta; M Bassetti; U Theuretzbacher; B T Tsuji; D W Wareham; L E Friberg; J J De Waele; V H Tam; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Substantial Impact of Altered Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients on the Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem Evaluated via the Dynamic Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Phillip J Bergen; Jürgen B Bulitta; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Kate E Rogers; Megan J McGregor; Steven C Wallis; David L Paterson; Roger L Nation; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis receiving high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

Authors:  I Bilgrami; J A Roberts; S C Wallis; J Thomas; J Davis; S Fowler; P B Goldrick; J Lipman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Strategies to reduce curative antibiotic therapy in intensive care units (adult and paediatric).

Authors:  Cédric Bretonnière; Marc Leone; Christophe Milési; Bernard Allaouchiche; Laurence Armand-Lefevre; Olivier Baldesi; Lila Bouadma; Dominique Decré; Samy Figueiredo; Rémy Gauzit; Benoît Guery; Nicolas Joram; Boris Jung; Sigismond Lasocki; Alain Lepape; Fabrice Lesage; Olivier Pajot; François Philippart; Bertrand Souweine; Pierre Tattevin; Jean-François Timsit; Renaud Vialet; Jean Ralph Zahar; Benoît Misset; Jean-Pierre Bedos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous-infusion meropenem in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

Authors:  Piergiorgio Cojutti; Natalia Maximova; Federico Pea
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacokinetics of ertapenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Rachel F Eyler; A Mary Vilay; Ahmed M Nader; Michael Heung; Melissa Pleva; Kevin M Sowinski; Daryl D DePestel; Fritz Sörgel; Martina Kinzig; Bruce A Mueller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in elderly patients: dosing simulations based on renal function.

Authors:  Muhammad Usman; Otto R Frey; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.