Literature DB >> 17307666

FDG-PET lymphoma demonstration project invitational workshop.

Gary J Kelloff1, Daniel M Sullivan, Wyndham Wilson, Bruce Cheson, Malik Juweid, George Q Mills, Andrew D Zelenetz, Sandra J Horning, Wolfgang Weber, Daniel J Sargent, Lori Dodd, Edward Korn, James Armitage, Richard Schilsky, Michaele Christian, Owen A O'connor, Sue Jane Wang, Ann T Farrell, Richard Pazdur, Michael Graham, Richard L Wahl, Steven M Larson, Lale Kostakoglu, Margaret Daube-Witherspoon, Constantine Gastonis, Barry A Siegel, Lalitha K Shankar, David B Lee, Howard R Higley, Caroline C Sigman, Daniel Carucci, David Timko, Louis J deGennaro, Ellen Sigal, Anna Barker, Janet Woodcock.   

Abstract

The proceedings of a workshop focusing on a project to evaluate the use of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) as a tool to measure treatment response in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are described. Sponsored by the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, the Foundation of the National Institutes of Health, and the National Cancer Institute, and attended by representatives of the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and scientists and clinical researchers from academia and the pharmaceutical and medical imaging industries, the workshop reviewed the etiology and current standards of care for NHL and proposed the development of a clinical trial to validate FDG-PET imaging techniques as a predictive biomarker for cancer therapy response. As organized under the auspices of the Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative, the three federal health agencies and their private sector and nonprofit/advocacy group partners believe that FDG-PET not only demonstrates the potential to be used for the diagnosis and staging of many cancers but in particular can provide an early indication of therapeutic response that is well correlated with clinical outcomes for chemotherapy for this common form of lymphoma. The development of standardized criteria for FDG-PET imaging and establishment of procedures for transmission, storage, quality assurance, and analysis of PET images afforded by this demonstration project could streamline clinical trials of new treatments for more intractable forms of lymphoma and other cancers and, hence, accelerate new drug approvals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307666     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  9 in total

Review 1.  FDG PET and risk-adapted therapy in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Yvette L Kasamon; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.645

2.  Quantitative imaging for evaluation of response to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Laurence P Clarke; Barbara S Croft; Robert Nordstrom; Huiming Zhang; Gary Kelloff; J Tatum
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

3.  The Quantitative Imaging Network: NCI's Historical Perspective and Planned Goals.

Authors:  Laurence P Clarke; Robert J Nordstrom; Huiming Zhang; Pushpa Tandon; Yantian Zhang; George Redmond; Keyvan Farahani; Gary Kelloff; Lori Henderson; Lalitha Shankar; James Deye; Jacek Capala; Paula Jacobs
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  Initial Standardized Uptake Value of Positron Emission Tomography Influences the Prognosis of Patients with Localized Gastric Adenocarcinoma Treated Preoperatively.

Authors:  Nikolaos Charalampakis; Lianchun Xiao; Elena Elimova; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Mariela A Blum; Venkatram Planjery; Jane E Rogers; Aurelio Matamoros; Tara Sagebiel; Prajnan Das; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Brian D Badgwell; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.935

5.  Transketolase is upregulated in metastatic peritoneal implants and promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Carmela Ricciardelli; Noor A Lokman; Sowmya Cheruvu; Izza A Tan; Miranda P Ween; Carmen E Pyragius; Andrew Ruszkiewicz; Peter Hoffmann; Martin K Oehler
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Predictive value of pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with newly diagnosed extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Bing Bai; Hui-Qiang Huang; Qi-Chun Cai; Wei Fan; Xiao-Xiao Wang; Xu Zhang; Ze-Xiao Lin; Yan Gao; Yun-Fei Xia; Ying Guo; Qing-Qing Cai; Wen-Qi Jiang; Tong-Yu Lin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  New technologies for human cancer imaging.

Authors:  John V Frangioni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase II study of risk-adapted therapy of newly diagnosed, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on midtreatment FDG-PET scanning.

Authors:  Yvette L Kasamon; Richard L Wahl; Harvey A Ziessman; Amanda L Blackford; Steven N Goodman; Caroline A Fidyk; Kathryn M Rogers; Javier Bolaños-Meade; Michael J Borowitz; Richard F Ambinder; Richard J Jones; Lode J Swinnen
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Prognostication and Risk-Adapted Therapy of Hodgkin's Lymphoma Using Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Yvette L Kasamon
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2010-12-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.