Literature DB >> 19167684

Phase II study of risk-adapted therapy of newly diagnosed, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on midtreatment FDG-PET scanning.

Yvette L Kasamon1, Richard L Wahl, Harvey A Ziessman, Amanda L Blackford, Steven N Goodman, Caroline A Fidyk, Kathryn M Rogers, Javier Bolaños-Meade, Michael J Borowitz, Richard F Ambinder, Richard J Jones, Lode J Swinnen.   

Abstract

In newly diagnosed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), a positive midtreatment fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scan often carries a poor prognosis, with reported 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rates of 0% to 30% after standard therapy. To determine the outcome of early treatment intensification for midtreatment PET-positive disease, a phase II trial of risk-adapted therapy was conducted. Fifty-nine newly diagnosed patients, 98% with B cell lymphoma, had PET/CT performed after 2 or 3 cycles of first-line chemotherapy. Those with negative PET on semiquantitative visual interpretation completed standard therapy. Those with positive PET received platinum-based salvage chemotherapy, high-dose therapy, and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Midtreatment PET was positive in 33 (56%); 28 received ASCT with an actuarial 2-year EFS of 75% (95% confidence interval, 60%-93%). On intention-to-treat analysis, 2-year EFS was 67% (53%-86%) in all PET-positive patients and 89% (77%-100%) in PET-negative patients. No association was found between the International Prognostic Index category and the midtreatment PET result. The favorable outcome achieved here in historically poor-risk patients warrants further, more definitive investigation of treatment modification based on early PET scanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19167684      PMCID: PMC4020440          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  21 in total

1.  Prognostic value of pretransplantation positron emission tomography using fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Karoline Spaepen; Sigrid Stroobants; Patrick Dupont; Peter Vandenberghe; Johan Maertens; Guy Bormans; José Thomas; Jan Balzarini; Christine De Wolf-Peeters; Luc Mortelmans; Gregor Verhoef
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Persistent tumor 18F-FDG uptake after a few cycles of polychemotherapy is predictive of treatment failure in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  G Jerusalem; Y Beguin; M F Fassotte; F Najjar; P Paulus; P Rigo; G Fillet
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support in first-line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma - results of a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Greb; Julia Bohlius; Sven Trelle; Daniel Schiefer; Carmino A De Souza; Christian Gisselbrecht; Tanin Intragumtornchai; Ulrich Kaiser; Hanneke C Kluin-Nelemans; Maurizio Martelli; Noel Jean Milpied; Gino Santini; Leo F Verdonck; Umberto Vitolo; Guido Schwarzer; Andreas Engert
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Shortened first-line high-dose chemotherapy for patients with poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma.

Authors:  Christian Gisselbrecht; Eric Lepage; Thierry Molina; Bruno Quesnel; Georges Fillet; Pierre Lederlin; Bertrand Coiffier; Hervé Tilly; Jean Gabarre; Francoise Guilmin; Olivier Hermine; Félix Reyes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) is a better predictor of outcome than the standard IPI for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP.

Authors:  Laurie H Sehn; Brian Berry; Mukesh Chhanabhai; Catherine Fitzgerald; Karamjit Gill; Paul Hoskins; Richard Klasa; Kerry J Savage; Tamara Shenkier; Judy Sutherland; Randy D Gascoyne; Joseph M Connors
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET Study Group.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Barry A Siegel; R Edward Coleman; Constantine G Gatsonis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Therapeutic evaluation and prognostic value of interim hybrid PET/CT with (18)F-FDG after three to four cycles of chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Jinhua Zhao; Wenli Qiao; Chun Wang; Taisong Wang; Yan Xing
Journal:  Hematology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.269

8.  High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens.

Authors:  H S Han; M P Escalón; B Hsiao; A Serafini; I S Lossos
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Strehl; Ulrich Mey; Axel Glasmacher; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Christine Mayr; Marcus Gorschlüter; Carsten Ziske; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  K Spaepen; S Stroobants; P Dupont; P Vandenberghe; J Thomas; T de Groot; J Balzarini; C De Wolf-Peeters; L Mortelmans; G Verhoef
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  16 in total

1.  The evolving role of F-FDG PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Peter J Hosein; Izidore S Lossos
Journal:  European J Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2010-02

Review 2.  Early interim PET scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: can there be consensus about standardized reporting, and can PET scans guide therapy choices?

Authors:  Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Michel Meignan; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Emmanuel Itti; Damien Huglo; Corinne Haioun; Franck Morschhauser
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Early treatment intensification with R-ICE and 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin)-BEAM stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients and positive interim PET after 4 cycles of R-CHOP-14.

Authors:  Mark Hertzberg; Maher K Gandhi; Judith Trotman; Belinda Butcher; John Taper; Amanda Johnston; Devinder Gill; Shir-Jing Ho; Gavin Cull; Keith Fay; Geoff Chong; Andrew Grigg; Ian D Lewis; Sam Milliken; William Renwick; Uwe Hahn; Robin Filshie; George Kannourakis; Anne-Marie Watson; Pauline Warburton; Andrew Wirth; John F Seymour; Michael S Hofman; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  FDG-PET as a biomarker for early response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as well as in Hodgkin lymphoma? Ready for implementation in clinical practice?

Authors:  Josée M Zijlstra; Coreline N Burggraaff; Marie José Kersten; Sally F Barrington
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Elizabeth R Gerstner; James M Mountz; Lawrence H Schwartz; Christopher W Ryan; Michael M Graham; John M Buatti; Fiona M Fennessy; Edward A Eikman; Virendra Kumar; Kenneth M Forster; Richard L Wahl; Frank S Lieberman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  18F-FDG PET/CT for early response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: poor predictive value of international harmonization project interpretation.

Authors:  Amanda F Cashen; Farrokh Dehdashti; Jingqin Luo; Andrew Homb; Barry A Siegel; Nancy L Bartlett
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Current role of FDG PET/CT in lymphoma.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  PET/CT in malignant lymphoma: basic information, clinical application, and proposal.

Authors:  Ukihide Tateishi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 10.  FDG-PET/CT based response-adapted treatment.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Dennis Vriens; Anne I J Arens; Martin Hutchings; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.