BACKGROUND: Prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta with nonelastic vascular grafts impairs the local Windkessel function. Whether this increases wall tension in the remaining aorta is still a not completely investigated hypothesis but is of clinical relevance with respect to postprocedural development of aneurysms and dissections, especially in the proximal descending aorta. METHODS: Fresh porcine thoracic aortas, including the root, were set up in a mock circulation before and after prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta. Cyclic changes in aortic dimensions were measured by ultrasonic micrometers at defined positions at the proximal part of the descending aorta. At the same positions, aortic pressures were recorded simultaneously using Millar tip manometers. Wall thickness was measured after pulsatile testing, and the resulting wall tension was calculated from the Laplace law. RESULTS: After prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta, peak systolic pressure in the proximal descending aorta increased from 117.6 +/- 6.1 mm Hg to 129.2 +/- 6.3 mm Hg, resulting in a rise of wall tension by 12.4% +/- 4.2% (p = 0.001). The maximum rate of pressure rise (dp/dt(max)) increased by 42.6% +/- 16.4% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the ascending aorta with noncompliant prosthetic material significantly increases wall tension and rate of pressure rise in the residual aorta. This may have clinical impact with respect to a sudden and sustained rise of mechanical load, especially at the vulnerable proximal descending aorta.
BACKGROUND: Prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta with nonelastic vascular grafts impairs the local Windkessel function. Whether this increases wall tension in the remaining aorta is still a not completely investigated hypothesis but is of clinical relevance with respect to postprocedural development of aneurysms and dissections, especially in the proximal descending aorta. METHODS: Fresh porcine thoracic aortas, including the root, were set up in a mock circulation before and after prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta. Cyclic changes in aortic dimensions were measured by ultrasonic micrometers at defined positions at the proximal part of the descending aorta. At the same positions, aortic pressures were recorded simultaneously using Millar tip manometers. Wall thickness was measured after pulsatile testing, and the resulting wall tension was calculated from the Laplace law. RESULTS: After prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta, peak systolic pressure in the proximal descending aorta increased from 117.6 +/- 6.1 mm Hg to 129.2 +/- 6.3 mm Hg, resulting in a rise of wall tension by 12.4% +/- 4.2% (p = 0.001). The maximum rate of pressure rise (dp/dt(max)) increased by 42.6% +/- 16.4% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the ascending aorta with noncompliant prosthetic material significantly increases wall tension and rate of pressure rise in the residual aorta. This may have clinical impact with respect to a sudden and sustained rise of mechanical load, especially at the vulnerable proximal descending aorta.
Authors: Maria C Palumbo; Alberto Redaelli; Matthew Wingo; Katherine A Tak; Jeremy R Leonard; Jiwon Kim; Lisa Q Rong; Christine Park; Hannah W Mitlak; Richard B Devereux; Mary J Roman; Arindam RoyChoudury; Christopher Lau; Mario F L Gaudino; Leonard N Girardi; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Christian D Etz; Martin Misfeld; Michael A Borger; Maximilian Luehr; Elfriede Strotdrees; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: Maria C Palumbo; Lisa Q Rong; Jiwon Kim; Pedram Navid; Razia Sultana; Jonathan Butcher; Alberto Redaelli; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Leonard N Girardi; Mario F L Gaudino; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander Weymann; Tamás Radovits; Bastian Schmack; Sevil Korkmaz; Shiliang Li; Nicole Chaimow; Ines Pätzold; Peter Moritz Becher; István Hartyánszky; Pál Soós; Gergő Merkely; Balázs Tamás Németh; Roland Istók; Gábor Veres; Béla Merkely; Konstantin Terytze; Matthias Karck; Gábor Szabó Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240