BACKGROUND: Prior investigation has shown that intravenous beta-blockers decrease T-wave alternans (TWA) positivity in patients undergoing electrophysiology study (EPS). The present study examined whether oral beta-blocker use within 24 hours of TWA influences yield and predictive value of TWA and EPS. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 387 patients (312 [81%] men, mean age 67 +/- 11 years) with coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia who underwent EPS and were followed for a mean of 2.8 +/- 1.4 years. T-Wave alternans was performed using an atrial pacing protocol and interpreted using standard criteria. Beta-blocker status was determined based on oral beta-blocker use in the 24 hours preceding the test: beta-blocker (-) (n = 62), beta-blocker (+) (n = 325). Follow-up for ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and death was obtained from chart review, device interrogation, and the Social Security Death Index. Estimated sensitivity and specificity of TWA and EPS stratified by beta-blocker use were calculated based on event-free 2-year survival. RESULTS: There was no difference in EPS (31 [50%] inducible off beta-blockers vs 166 [51%] on beta-blockers [P = .89]) or TWA (26 [42%] positive, 17 [27%] indeterminate off beta-blockers vs 136 [42%] positive, 81 [25%] indeterminate on beta-blockers [P = .89]). Beta-blocker use within 24 hours of testing did not affect the predictive value of TWA or EPS for overall or 2-year event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Oral beta-blocker therapy appears to have no effect on yield or predictive value of EPS or TWA in patients with coronary artery disease, diminished left ventricular function, and a history of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.
BACKGROUND: Prior investigation has shown that intravenous beta-blockers decrease T-wave alternans (TWA) positivity in patients undergoing electrophysiology study (EPS). The present study examined whether oral beta-blocker use within 24 hours of TWA influences yield and predictive value of TWA and EPS. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 387 patients (312 [81%] men, mean age 67 +/- 11 years) with coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia who underwent EPS and were followed for a mean of 2.8 +/- 1.4 years. T-Wave alternans was performed using an atrial pacing protocol and interpreted using standard criteria. Beta-blocker status was determined based on oral beta-blocker use in the 24 hours preceding the test: beta-blocker (-) (n = 62), beta-blocker (+) (n = 325). Follow-up for ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and death was obtained from chart review, device interrogation, and the Social Security Death Index. Estimated sensitivity and specificity of TWA and EPS stratified by beta-blocker use were calculated based on event-free 2-year survival. RESULTS: There was no difference in EPS (31 [50%] inducible off beta-blockers vs 166 [51%] on beta-blockers [P = .89]) or TWA (26 [42%] positive, 17 [27%] indeterminate off beta-blockers vs 136 [42%] positive, 81 [25%] indeterminate on beta-blockers [P = .89]). Beta-blocker use within 24 hours of testing did not affect the predictive value of TWA or EPS for overall or 2-year event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Oral beta-blocker therapy appears to have no effect on yield or predictive value of EPS or TWA in patients with coronary artery disease, diminished left ventricular function, and a history of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.
Authors: Euler de Vilhena Garcia; Nelson Samesima; Horácio G Pereira Filho; Cristina M Quadros; Luis Tenório Cavalcante da Silva; Martino Martinelli Filho; Maria Luciana Zacharias Hannouche; Wilson Mathias; Carlos Alberto Pastore Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 1.468