Literature DB >> 17306905

Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery: a prospective study in 100 patients.

B Balduyck1, J Hendriks, P Lauwers, P Van Schil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate quality of life (QoL) evolution after thoracic surgery for lung cancer with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire-C30 and the lung cancer specific module LC13.
METHODS: A prospective QoL registration started in 2002 for all patients undergoing major pulmonary surgery for malignant disease. Between January 2002 and November 2004, 100 patients were included. Questionnaires were administered pre-operatively and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively (MPO) with response rates of 100%, 71%, 77%, 83% and 76%, respectively. PROCEDURES: lobectomy 61%, pneumonectomy 17%, and wedge resection 22%. Approaches: anterolateral thoracotomy 79%, posterolateral thoracotomy 13% and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) 8%.
RESULTS: Lobectomy and wedge resection are comparable in QoL evolution. Both resections are characterized by a 1 month temporary decrease in QoL functioning scores and an increase in pain symptoms. Lobectomy patients report an increase in dyspnea in the first month post-operatively, not seen after wedge resection. With exception of thoracic pain after lobectomy, QoL scores approximated baseline values 3MPO indicating good recovery. After pneumonectomy, there is no return to baseline in physical functioning, role functioning, pain, shoulder function and dyspnea in a 12 months follow-up period. Other QoL scores were comparable with baseline values. Pneumonectomy was significantly associated with a less favorable QoL score evolution when compared with lobectomy. Comparing antero- and posterolateral thoracotomy, significant differences in pain and dyspnea were seen in favor of the anterolateral technique. Comparing thoracotomy to VATS, significant differences were seen in physical functioning, QoL and thoracic pain in favor of VATS.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study documented QoL evolution profiles comparing pre-operative status with deficits and changes at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after pulmonary surgery. Lung cancer surgery is well tolerated by the majority of patients. Lobectomy patients have a more favorable physical functioning and less thoracic pain, compared to pneumonectomy. Antero- and posterolateral thoracotomy are comparable for QoL evolution. After posterolateral thoracotomy more post-operative pain and dyspnea was seen. Post-operative physical functioning, pain and QoL are in favor of VATS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17306905     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  27 in total

1.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy using a standardized anterior approach.

Authors:  Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Merete Christensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Pulmonary metastasis: rationale for local treatments and techniques.

Authors:  Jun Nakajima
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-09-22

3.  Very long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Shigeki Sawada; Eisaku Komori; Motohiro Yamashita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Simultaneous lung resection via a transdiaphragmatic approach in patients undergoing liver resection for synchronous liver and lung metastases.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Mise; Reza J Mehran; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Development and validation of a theoretical test of proficiency for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Mona Meral Savran; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; William Walker; Thomas Schmid; Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: republication of a systematic review and a proposal by the guidelines committee of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery 2014.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Yamashita; Taichiro Goto; Takeshi Mori; Hirotoshi Horio; Yoshihisa Kadota; Takeshi Nagayasu; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-03

Review 7.  Survivorship in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges Faced and Steps Forward.

Authors:  Namrata Vijayvergia; Prashant C Shah; Crystal S Denlinger
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 8.  Palliative care in lung cancer.

Authors:  Betty Ferrell; Marianna Koczywas; Fred Grannis; Annie Harrington
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  How does the type of thoracotomy affect the patient quality of life? A short form-36 health survey study.

Authors:  Timuçin Alar; Kenan Can Ceylan; Seyda Ors Kaya; Serpil Sevinç; Deniz Sigirli; Cemal Ozçelik
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Comprehensive long-term care of patients with lung cancer: development of a novel thoracic survivorship program.

Authors:  James Huang; Amy E Logue; Jamie S Ostroff; Bernard J Park; Mary McCabe; David R Jones; Manjit S Bains; Nabil P Rizk; Mark G Kris; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.