Literature DB >> 17306541

The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection.

Anna Van Homrigh1, Megan Higgie, Katrina McGuigan, Mark W Blows.   

Abstract

Sexually selected traits display substantial genetic variance [1, 2], in conflict with the expectation that sexual selection will deplete it [3-5]. Condition dependence is thought to resolve this paradox [5-7], but experimental tests that relate the direction of sexual selection to the availability of genetic variance are lacking. Here, we show that condition-dependent expression is not sufficient to maintain genetic variance available to sexual selection in multiple male sexually selected traits. We employed an experimental design that simultaneously determined the quantitative genetic basis of nine male cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) of Drosophila bunnanda, the extent of condition dependence of these traits, and the strength and direction of sexual selection acting upon them. The CHCs of D. bunnanda are condition dependent, with 18% of the genetic variance in male body size explained by genetic variance in CHCs. Despite the presence of genetic variance in individual male traits, 98% of the genetic variance in CHCs was found to be orientated more than 88 degrees away from the direction of sexual selection and therefore unavailable to selection. A lack of genetic variance in male traits in the direction of sexual selection may represent a general feature of sexually selected systems, even in the presence of condition-dependent trait expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17306541     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  24 in total

1.  Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bedhomme; Adam K Chippindale; N G Prasad; Matthieu Delcourt; Jessica K Abbott; Martin A Mallet; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 2.  Gene duplication, tissue-specific gene expression and sexual conflict in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).

Authors:  Richard H Baker; Apurva Narechania; Philip M Johns; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mating tactics determine patterns of condition dependence in a dimorphic horned beetle.

Authors:  Robert J Knell; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Reproductive skew and selection on female ornamentation in social species.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein; Irby J Lovette
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Quantitative genetics, version 3.0: where have we gone since 1987 and where are we headed?

Authors:  Bruce Walsh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Conflicting preferences within females: sexual selection versus species recognition.

Authors:  Gil G Rosenthal; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Quantitative genetic analysis suggests causal association between cuticular hydrocarbon composition and desiccation survival in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B R Foley; M Telonis-Scott
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus.

Authors:  Melissa L Thomas; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.