Literature DB >> 17305681

Medical screening for red flags in the diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal spine pain.

Phillip S Sizer1, Jean-Michel Brismée, Chad Cook.   

Abstract

When a patient presents with pain in the different regions of the spine, the clinician executes a region-appropriate basic examination that includes appropriate historical cues and specific physical examination tests that can be used to identify red flags. The clinical tests include a specific examination of the sensory and motor systems. Test outcomes are best interpreted in context with the entire examination profile, where the sensitivity and specificity of these tests can influence their utility in uncovering red flags. These red flags can be categorized based on the nature and severity or the specific elements of the patient's presentation. Many general red flags can be observed in any region of the spine, while specific red flags must be categorized and discussed for each spinal region. This categorization can guide the clinician in the direction of management, whether that management is aimed at redirecting the patient's care to another specialist, reconsidering the presentation and observing for clusters of findings that may suggest red flags, or managing the patient within the clinician's specialty in context with the severity of the patient's presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17305681     DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00112.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Pract        ISSN: 1530-7085            Impact factor:   3.183


  20 in total

1.  Imaging in conjunction with physical therapy in management of a patient with history of thoracic tumour.

Authors:  Daniel G Rendeiro; Gail D Deyle; William G Boissonnault
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07

2.  Invited commentary.

Authors:  Phil S Sizer
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

3.  Differential diagnosis and management of an older runner with an atypical neurodynamic presentation: a case for clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Jonathan Sylvain; Michael P Reiman
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

4.  How radiological findings can help or hinder patients' recovery in the rehabilitation management of patients with low back pain: what can clinicians do?

Authors:  Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Christian Longtin; Jean-Michel Brismée
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-04-07

5.  Metastatic cancer mimicking mechanical low back pain: a case report.

Authors:  Lance M Mabry; Michael D Ross; John M Tonarelli
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

6.  Major Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Total Spine MRI Performed in the Emergency Department at a Major Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  C W C Huang; A Ali; Y-M Chang; A F Bezuidenhout; D B Hackney; J A Edlow; R A Bhadelia
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Today or tomorrow? A retrospective analysis of the clinical indications used to request urgent magnetic resonance imaging of the spine.

Authors:  Tanujan Thangarajah; Donal O'Donoghue; Robin Pillay
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Inter-rater reliability and validity of the screenassist lumbar questionnaire: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shala Cunningham
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-12

9.  Diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity and specificity of the ScreenAssist Lumbar Questionnaire in comparison with primary care provider tests and measures of low back pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shala Cunningham
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-02

10.  A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.