Literature DB >> 17305438

Paradoxical enhancement of letter recognition in developmental dyslexia.

Thomas Lachmann1, Cees van Leeuwen.   

Abstract

In a number of studies, children diagnosed with developmental dyslexia reached normal scores in standard visual processing tasks, and some researchers concluded that visual processing deficits are not involved in the syndrome. The tasks used, however, may be insensitive to anomalous visual information processing strategies used to compensate for an underlying deficit. To determine whether children with dyslexia use anomalous visual processing strategies, a same-different task was applied, in which 2 items identical under rotation and reflection were judged as same. Pairs of letters or dot patterns were used, which were either symmetric or asymmetric in shape. Children with dyslexia performed faster than normal-reading children--in particular, remarkably, with letters. Symmetry of dot patterns facilitated performance in both children with dyslexia and normal-reading children; symmetry of letters facilitated performance in children with dyslexia but not in normal-reading children. Children with dyslexia, therefore, fail to adequately differentiate visual processing of linguistic and non-linguistic materials; they process symmetry in letters similarly to that in shapes, which leads in this particular task to the paradoxical observation of children with dyslexia outperforming normal readers with letters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17305438     DOI: 10.1207/s15326942dn3101_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1532-6942            Impact factor:   2.253


  14 in total

1.  Timing the impact of literacy on visual processing.

Authors:  Felipe Pegado; Enio Comerlato; Fabricio Ventura; Antoinette Jobert; Kimihiro Nakamura; Marco Buiatti; Paulo Ventura; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Régine Kolinsky; José Morais; Lucia W Braga; Laurent Cohen; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The cost of blocking the mirror generalization process in reading: evidence for the role of inhibitory control in discriminating letters with lateral mirror-image counterparts.

Authors:  Grégoire Borst; Emmanuel Ahr; Margot Roell; Olivier Houdé
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

3.  Visual recognition of mirrored letters and the right hemisphere advantage for mirror-invariant object recognition.

Authors:  Matthew T Harrison; Lars Strother
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  Effect of orthographic processes on letter identity and letter-position encoding in dyslexic children.

Authors:  Caroline Reilhac; Mélanie Jucla; Stéphanie Iannuzzi; Sylviane Valdois; Jean-François Démonet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

5.  Learning to read aligns visual analytical skills with grapheme-phoneme mapping: evidence from illiterates.

Authors:  Thomas Lachmann; Gunjan Khera; Narayanan Srinivasan; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Evol Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-12

6.  E-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Chen Chen; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neural correlates of letter reversal in children and adults.

Authors:  Liwei King Blackburne; Marianna D Eddy; Priya Kalra; Debbie Yee; Pawan Sinha; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The influence of reading expertise in mirror-letter perception: Evidence from beginning and expert readers.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; María Dimitropoulou; Adelina Estévez; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Mind Brain Educ       Date:  2013-06-01

9.  Letters in the forest: global precedence effect disappears for letters but not for non-letters under reading-like conditions.

Authors:  Thomas Lachmann; Andreas Schmitt; Wouter Braet; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17

10.  Reading as functional coordination: not recycling but a novel synthesis.

Authors:  Thomas Lachmann; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.