Literature DB >> 17303408

DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation.

Jiri Bartek1, Jiri Lukas.   

Abstract

In response to diverse genotoxic stresses, cells activate DNA damage checkpoint pathways to protect genomic integrity and promote survival of the organism. Depending on DNA lesions and context, damaged cells with alarmed checkpoints can be eliminated by apoptosis or silenced by cellular senescence, or can survive and resume cell cycle progression upon checkpoint termination. Over the past two years a plethora of mechanistic studies have provided exciting insights into the biology and pathology of checkpoint initiation and signal propagation, and have revealed the various ways in which the response can be terminated: through recovery, adaptation or cancer-prone subversion. Such studies highlight the dynamic nature of these processes and help us to better understand the molecular basis, spatiotemporal orchestration and biological significance of the DNA damage response in normal and cancerous cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17303408     DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol        ISSN: 0955-0674            Impact factor:   8.382


  314 in total

Review 1.  Prophase I arrest and progression to metaphase I in mouse oocytes: comparison of resumption of meiosis and recovery from G2-arrest in somatic cells.

Authors:  Petr Solc; Richard M Schultz; Jan Motlik
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  Coupled activation and degradation of eEF2K regulates protein synthesis in response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Flore Kruiswijk; Laurensia Yuniati; Roberto Magliozzi; Teck Yew Low; Ratna Lim; Renske Bolder; Shabaz Mohammed; Christopher G Proud; Albert J R Heck; Michele Pagano; Daniele Guardavaccaro
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  MicroRNA-22 promotes cell survival upon UV radiation by repressing PTEN.

Authors:  Guangyun Tan; Yuling Shi; Zhao-Hui Wu
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Checkpoint recovery after DNA damage: a rolling stop for CDKs.

Authors:  Anja M Duursma; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Recovery from a DNA-damage-induced G2 arrest requires Cdk-dependent activation of FoxM1.

Authors:  Mónica Alvarez-Fernández; Vincentius A Halim; Lenno Krenning; Melinda Aprelia; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J Heck; René H Medema
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 6.  Genomic integrity and the ageing brain.

Authors:  Hei-man Chow; Karl Herrup
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  Role of AKT signaling in DNA repair and clinical response to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Qun Liu; Kristen M Turner; W K Alfred Yung; Kexin Chen; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Regulation of polo-like kinase 1 by DNA damage and PP2A/B55α.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Qingyuan Guo; Laura A Fisher; Dongxu Liu; Aimin Peng
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  A novel non-coding RNA lncRNA-JADE connects DNA damage signalling to histone H4 acetylation.

Authors:  Guohui Wan; Xiaoxiao Hu; Yunhua Liu; Cecil Han; Anil K Sood; George A Calin; Xinna Zhang; Xiongbin Lu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Sharp-1 modulates the cellular response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Liu; Teng-Kai Chung; Jiali Li; Reshma Taneja
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.