Literature DB >> 17303302

Optimisation of the long-term efficacy of dental chair waterline disinfection by the identification and rectification of factors associated with waterline disinfection failure.

M J O'Donnell1, A C Shore, R J Russell, D C Coleman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Although many studies have highlighted the problem of biofilm growth in dental chair unit waterlines (DUWs), no long-term studies on the efficacy of DUW disinfection using a large number of dental chair units (DCUs) have been reported.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term (21 months) efficacy of the Planmeca Waterline Cleaning System (WCS) to maintain the quality of DUW output water below the American Dental Association (ADA) recommended standard of < or =200cfu/mL of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria using once weekly disinfection with the hydrogen peroxide-and silver ion-containing disinfectant Planosil.
METHODS: Microbiological quality of DUW output water was monitored by culture on R2A agar for 10 DCUs fitted with the WCS. The presence of biofilm in DUWs was examined by electron microscopy.
RESULTS: During the first 9 months a high prevalence (28/300 disinfection cycles; 9.3%) of intermittent DUW disinfection failure occurred in 8/10 DCUs due to operator omission to disinfect all DUWs (10/28 failed cycles), incorrect compressed air pressure failing to distribute the disinfectant properly (4/28 failed cycles) and physical blockage of disinfectant intake valves due to corrosion effects of Planosil (14/28 failed cycles). On rectification of these faults through engineering redesign and procedural changes, no further cases of intermittent DUW disinfection failure were observed. Independently of these factors, a rapid and consistent decline in efficacy of DUW disinfection occurred in 4/10 DCUs following the initial 9 months of once weekly disinfection. There was a highly significant difference (P<0.0001) in the prevalence of strongly catalase-positive Novosphingobium and Sphingomonas bacterial species (mean average prevalence of 37.1%) in DUW output water from these 4 DCUs compared to the other 6 DCUs and DCU supply water (prevalence <1%), which correlated with biofilm presence in the DUWs and indicated selective pressure for maintenance of these species by prolonged disinfectant usage. Planosil was reformulated to a more concentrated form (Planosil Forte) and when used once weekly was found to maintain bacterial density in output water below the ADA standard for all 10 DCUs.
CONCLUSIONS: A variety of factors can contribute to failure of DUW disinfection in the long-term, including human error, disinfectant corrosion of equipment and natural selection of naturally disinfectant-tolerant bacterial species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17303302     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the microbial load of incoming and distal outlet waters from dental unit water systems in Istanbul.

Authors:  Irfan Türetgen; Duygu Göksay; Aysin Cotuk
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Monitoring dental-unit-water-line output water by current in-office test kits.

Authors:  Sham Lal; Sim K Singhrao; Matt Bricknell; Mark Pearce; L H Glyn Morton; Waqar Ahmed; St John Crean
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Biofilm-forming bacteria with varying tolerance to peracetic acid from a paper machine.

Authors:  Stiina Rasimus; Marko Kolari; Hannu Rita; Douwe Hoornstra; Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  A survey of the bacterial diversity in the cup filler of dental chair units.

Authors:  Vítor Silva; Vânia Figueira; Helena Figueiral; Célia M Manaia
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.476

5.  Efficacy of BRS® and Alpron®/Bilpron® Disinfectants for Dental Unit Waterlines: A Six-Year Study.

Authors:  Alexandre Baudet; Julie Lizon; Jean-Marc Martrette; Frédéric Camelot; Arnaud Florentin; Céline Clément
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.