Literature DB >> 17302853

Active parental consent for a school-based community violence screening: comparing distribution methods.

Bradley D Stein1, Lisa H Jaycox, Audra Langley, Sheryl H Kataoka, Windy S Wilkins, Marleen Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Students are unable to benefit from many school programs designed to address their mental health needs if their parents do not consent to their participation. As part of an ongoing effort in a large urban school district to meet the mental health needs of students traumatized by violence exposure, this paper examines the impact of alternative approaches on parental response and consent rates for an initial screening to participate in a school mental health program.
METHODS: Two alternative approaches were used to obtain consent for students to participate in a school-based intervention for students exposed to violence. For one cohort, consent forms were distributed along with school information and other school forms during a parent orientation meeting. In the other cohort, school mental health clinicians visited student homerooms to distribute consent forms and explain the program and evaluation to students.
RESULTS: There were significantly higher rates of return of consent forms (89.8% vs 53.2%) and parents consenting to participate (69.6% vs 27.9%) among parents receiving consent forms at a school meeting than among parents whose forms were distributed to children in a classroom, with comparable rates of active refusals to participate (20.1% vs 25.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall return rates and rates of consent for screening participation were substantially higher when the consent form and accompanying materials were provided directly to parents rather than distributed in the classroom and sent home with students. These findings have implications for efforts to obtain active consent from parents for students to participate in school mental health programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17302853     DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00180.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  8 in total

1.  Adolescent Dating Violence Prevention Program for Early Adolescents: The Me & You Randomized Controlled Trial, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Melissa F Peskin; Christine M Markham; Ross Shegog; Elizabeth R Baumler; Robert C Addy; Jeff R Temple; Belinda Hernandez; Paula M Cuccaro; Melanie A Thiel; Efrat K Gabay; Susan R Tortolero Emery
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Evaluating Active Parental Consent Procedures for School Programming: Addressing the Sensitive Topic of Suicide Prevention.

Authors:  Christine M Wienke Totura; Krista Kutash; Christa D Labouliere; Marc S Karver
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.118

3.  Effects of the It's Your Game . . . Keep It Real program on dating violence in ethnic-minority middle school youths: a group randomized trial.

Authors:  Melissa F Peskin; Christine M Markham; Ross Shegog; Elizabeth R Baumler; Robert C Addy; Susan R Tortolero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Mental health interventions in schools 1: Mental health interventions in schools in high-income countries.

Authors:  Mina Fazel; Kimberly Hoagwood; Sharon Stephan; Tamsin Ford
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 27.083

5.  Prevalence and Correlates of the Perpetration of Cyber Dating Abuse among Early Adolescents.

Authors:  Melissa F Peskin; Christine M Markham; Ross Shegog; Jeff R Temple; Elizabeth R Baumler; Robert C Addy; Belinda Hernandez; Paula Cuccaro; Efrat K Gabay; Melanie Thiel; Susan Tortolero Emery
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-09-24

6.  Behavioral inhibition and risk for posttraumatic stress symptoms in Latino children exposed to violence.

Authors:  Omar G Gudiño
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-08

7.  Improving survey response rates from parents in school-based research using a multi-level approach.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Schilpzand; Emma Sciberras; Daryl Efron; Vicki Anderson; Jan M Nicholson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A combined impact-process evaluation of a program promoting active transport to school: understanding the factors that shaped program effectiveness.

Authors:  S Crawford; J Garrard
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-03-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.