OBJECTIVES: We examined whether It's Your Game . . . Keep It Real (IYG) reduced dating violence among ethnic-minority middle school youths, a population at high risk for dating violence. METHODS: We analyzed data from 766 predominantly ethnic-minority students from 10 middle schools in southeast Texas in 2004 for a group randomized trial of IYG. We estimated logistic regression models, and the primary outcome was emotional and physical dating violence perpetration and victimization by ninth grade. RESULTS: Control students had significantly higher odds of physical dating violence victimization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20, 1.92), emotional dating violence victimization (AOR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.36, 2.24), and emotional dating violence perpetration (AOR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.11, 2.26) than did intervention students. The odds of physical dating violence perpetration were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Program effects varied by gender and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: IYG significantly reduced 3 of 4 dating violence outcomes among ethnic-minority middle school youths. Although further study is warranted to determine if IYG should be widely disseminated to prevent dating violence, it is one of only a handful of school-based programs that are effective in reducing adolescent dating violence behavior.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We examined whether It's Your Game . . . Keep It Real (IYG) reduced dating violence among ethnic-minority middle school youths, a population at high risk for dating violence. METHODS: We analyzed data from 766 predominantly ethnic-minority students from 10 middle schools in southeast Texas in 2004 for a group randomized trial of IYG. We estimated logistic regression models, and the primary outcome was emotional and physical dating violence perpetration and victimization by ninth grade. RESULTS: Control students had significantly higher odds of physical dating violence victimization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20, 1.92), emotional dating violence victimization (AOR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.36, 2.24), and emotional dating violence perpetration (AOR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.11, 2.26) than did intervention students. The odds of physical dating violence perpetration were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Program effects varied by gender and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: IYG significantly reduced 3 of 4 dating violence outcomes among ethnic-minority middle school youths. Although further study is warranted to determine if IYG should be widely disseminated to prevent dating violence, it is one of only a handful of school-based programs that are effective in reducing adolescent dating violence behavior.
Authors: Melissa F Peskin; Christine M Markham; Ross Shegog; Elizabeth R Baumler; Robert C Addy; Jeff R Temple; Belinda Hernandez; Paula M Cuccaro; Melanie A Thiel; Efrat K Gabay; Susan R Tortolero Emery Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ramona K C Finnie; Devon L Okasako-Schmucker; Leigh Buchanan; Denise Carty; Holly Wethington; Shawna L Mercer; Kathleen C Basile; Sarah DeGue; Phyllis Holditch Niolon; Jennifer Bishop; Tisha Titus; Samia Noursi; Shavon Artis Dickerson; Daniel Whitaker; Susan Swider; Patrick Remington Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 6.604
Authors: Melissa F Peskin; Christine M Markham; Ross Shegog; Jeff R Temple; Elizabeth R Baumler; Robert C Addy; Belinda Hernandez; Paula Cuccaro; Efrat K Gabay; Melanie Thiel; Susan Tortolero Emery Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2016-09-24
Authors: H Luz McNaughton Reyes; Laurie M Graham; May S Chen; Deborah Baron; Andrew Gibbs; Alison K Groves; Lusajo Kajula; Sarah Bowler; Suzanne Maman Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2020-11-19