Literature DB >> 17302703

Estimation of the optimal VV delay by an IEGM-based method in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Xiaoyi Min1, Mathias Meine, James H Baker, Luis A Pires, Kyong T Turk, Evelyn M Horn, Robert C Kowal, Michael Paris, Euljoon Park, Eric S Fain.   

Abstract

Determination of the optimal interventricular (VV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy currently relies on costly, time-consuming echocardiographic (ECHO) methods. This study evaluated the performance of a new intracardiac electrogram (IEGM)-based VV method compared to the aortic velocity time integral (AVTI) method of VV delay optimization. The study included two patient groups. Eleven patients enrolled by a single center in the Rhythm II ICD trial underwent prospective comparisons of the AVTI at the VV interval determined by the IEGM VV method versus the maximum AVTI at the echocardiographically determined optimal VV delay. In 61 patients enrolled in the RHYTHM VV trial, the same testing methods were compared retrospectively. In the prospective study, the maximum AVTI by the ECHO-based method (24.3 +/- 7.9 cm), was closely correlated with maximum AVTI by the IEGM-based method (23.9 +/- 7.9 cm; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.99; 95% confidence, lower limit of 98%. Likewise, in the retrospective analysis, the ECHO-determined maximum AVTI (22.1 +/- 8.2 cm) was similar to that determined by the IEGM-based method (20.9 +/- 8.3 cm; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.98; 95% confidence, lower limit of 97%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17302703     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00597.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for pacemaker programming in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Marc K Lahiri; Justin T Mao; Claudio D Schuger
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Impact of moderate exercise workload on predicted optimal AV and VV delays determined by an intracardiac electrogram-based method for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Margit Strauss; Torsten Becker; Thomas Kleemann; Ngoc Dyck; Frank Birkenhauer; Karlheinz Seidl
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods.

Authors:  Cinzia Valzania; Maria J Eriksson; Giuseppe Boriani; Fredrik Gadler
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  Comparison between IEGM-based approach and echocardiography in AV/PV and VV delay optimization in CRT-D recipients (Quicksept study).

Authors:  Massimo Giammaria; Gianluca Quirino; Enrico Cecchi; Gaetano Senatore; Paolo Pistelli; Mario Bocchiardo; Roberto Mureddu; Paolo Diotallevi; Eraldo Occhetta; Andrea Magnani; Mauro Bensoni; Catia Checchinato; Valentina Conti; Sandra Badolati; Antonio Mazza
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-06-03

5.  Prediction of clinical outcome in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - the role of NT-ProBNP and a combined response score.

Authors:  Z Bakos; N C Chatterjee; C Reitan; J P Singh; R Borgquist
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.