Literature DB >> 17301348

Crossing multidisciplinary divides: exploring professional hierarchies and boundaries in focus groups.

Emma K Clavering1, Janice McLaughlin.   

Abstract

Focus groups are an important element of qualitative health research, valued for the forms of knowledge and understanding that emerge from interactions among participants. Common advice for focus groups within health research is to limit the level of variation among respondents to generate comprehensive discussion and shared knowledge. In this article, the authors critically examine this advice, proposing instead that it is useful to acknowledge and, at times, consciously build in heterogeneity across categories of those present. The benefit of doing this is that the interaction thus generated can be used as a space within which to explore differing professional positions and interpretations of issues under discussion. Using research they have done, they explore the practical issues involved in getting different health and social care professionals together and go on to discuss the value and significance of using focus groups to explore the production of professional hierarchies and boundaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17301348     DOI: 10.1177/1049732306298380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  7 in total

1.  Implications for the design of a Diagnostic Decision Support System (DDSS) to reduce time and cost to diagnosis in paediatric shoulder instability.

Authors:  Fraser Philp; Alice Faux-Nightingale; Sandra Woolley; Ed de Quincey; Anand Pandyan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Well-child care delivery in the community in China: Related factors and quality analysis of services.

Authors:  Pan Mao; Hui Feng; Shuang Xu; Jianghong Liu; Huayan Li; Yaying Zhang; Yiyan Ye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Development of an intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis through primary care: a protocol.

Authors:  Marian Andrei Stanciu; Rebecca-Jane Law; Sadia Nafees; Maggie Hendry; Seow Tien Yeo; Julia Hiscock; Ruth Lewis; Rhiannon T Edwards; Nefyn H Williams; Katherine Brain; Paul Brocklehurst; Andrew Carson-Stevens; Sunil Dolwani; Jon Emery; William Hamilton; Zoe Hoare; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Greg Rubin; Stephanie Smits; Peter Vedsted; Fiona Walter; Clare Wilkinson; Richard D Neal
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2018-09-05

4.  Healthcare Professionals' Views of Factors Influencing Diabetes Self-Management and the Utility of a mHealth Application and Its Features to Support Self-Care.

Authors:  Sungwon Yoon; Jun Hao Ng; Yu Heng Kwan; Lian Leng Low
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  'You should at least ask'. The expectations, hopes and fears of rare disease patients on large-scale data and biomaterial sharing for genomics research.

Authors:  Pauline McCormack; Anna Kole; Sabina Gainotti; Deborah Mascalzoni; Caron Molster; Hanns Lochmüller; Simon Woods
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Australian general practitioners' perspectives on their role in well-child health care.

Authors:  Adrian Jeyendra; Jeremy Rajadurai; Joanna Chanmugam; Alan Trieu; Suraj Nair; Radheshan Baskaran; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Hospice Employees' Perceptions of Their Work Environment: A Focus Group Perspective.

Authors:  Rebecca H Lehto; Carrie Heeter; Jeffrey Forman; Tait Shanafelt; Arif Kamal; Patrick Miller; Michael Paletta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.