Literature DB >> 17299559

Cranioplasty using polymethyl methacrylate implant constructed from an alginate impression and wax elimination technique.

Ae Abdulai1, Mi Iddrissu, Tk Dakurah.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Summary
DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of the record charts.
SETTING: A joint study by maxillofacial and neurosurgical units, department of surgery, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana, a tertiary and premier health care centre. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen consecutive patients with various cranial defects treated using prefabricated acrylic methyl methacrylate implants.
INTERVENTIONS: The cranioplasty on all the patients took place at an average of about 12 months after the initial surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These included complications during and after surgery. X-ray views of the skull, ranging from true lateral to anterior-posterior, were taken at follow-up and examined to ascertain the stability of the graft by looking out for any adverse bony changes around it or loosening of any of the steel sutures securing it to the skull.
RESULTS: A total of 17 patients (5 males and 12 females) with a mean age of 30.4 years were treated. Follow-up period ranged from 9 months to two years. In all cases the surgical procedure was uneventful and the cosmetic results were good. There was no significant change in the size and shape of the preformed methyl methacrylate implant after autoclaving.
CONCLUSION: Cranioplasty using prefabricated acrylic methyl methacrylate implants apart from being affordable also ensure shorter operative time and good aesthetic result.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 17299559      PMCID: PMC1790836     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ghana Med J        ISSN: 0016-9560


  10 in total

Review 1.  The use of bone grafts and alloplastic materials in cranioplasty.

Authors:  D J Prolo; S A Oklund
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A pre-formed methyl methacrylate cranioplasty.

Authors:  P R Cooper; B Schechter; G B Jacobs; R C Rubin; R L Wille
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1977-09

3.  Titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty.

Authors:  L I Malis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Technique for cranioplasty prosthesis fabrication.

Authors:  R D Jordan; J T White; N Schupper
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Cranioplasty: a method of prefabricating alloplastic plates.

Authors:  J E Maniscalco; F Garcia-Bengochea
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1974-09

6.  Cranioplasty made easier.

Authors:  A S Genest
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1978-10

7.  Cranioplasty with autogenous autoclaved calvarial bone flap in the cases of tumoural invasion.

Authors:  V Vanaclocha; N Sáiz-Sapena; C García-Casasola; E De Alava
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Cranioplasty for acquired skull defects in children--a comparison between autologous material and methylmethacrylate 1974-1990.

Authors:  J P Pochon; J Klöti
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.191

9.  Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children: long-term results.

Authors:  K S Blum; S J Schneider; A D Rosenthal
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.162

10.  Preformed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasties: report of 45 cases.

Authors:  A V van Gool
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1985-02
  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Reconstruction of bony facial contour deficiencies with polymethylmethacrylate implants: case report.

Authors:  Ruy C C Abdo Filho; Thais M Oliveira; Natalino Lourenço Neto; Carla Gurgel; Ruy C C Abdo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Cranioplasty with custom made alloplastic prosthetic implant: A case report.

Authors:  Lokendra Gupta; In Aparna; Dhanasekar Balakrishnan; Lingeshwar Deenadayalan; Puneeth Hegde; Priyanka Agarwal
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Cranioplasty using presurgically fabricated presterilised polymethyl methacrylate plate by a simple, cost-effective technique on patients with and without original bone flap: study on 29 patients.

Authors:  G M Sharavanan; Suresh Jayabalan; K Rajasukumaran; Ganesh Veerasekar; G Sathya
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-08-28

4.  Esthetic correction of depressed frontal bone fracture.

Authors:  J K Dayashankara Rao; Vijaylaxmi Malhotra; Ravi S Batra; Abhishek Kukreja
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01

5.  Low-cost customized cranioplasty using a 3D digital printing model: a case report.

Authors:  Abel De La Peña; Javier De La Peña-Brambila; Juan Pérez-De La Torre; Miguel Ochoa; Guillermo J Gallardo
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2018-04-12

6.  Reconstruction of cranial defect with patient-specific implants: Four different cost-effective techniques.

Authors:  Dushyant Chauhan; Probodh Kumar Chattopadhyay; Ashish Thakur
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

7.  Using the head as a mould for cranioplasty with methylmethacrylate.

Authors:  G M Bot; N J Ismail; B Usman; D J Shilong; J O Obande; S Aliu; D Sale; B B Shehu
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2013-10

8.  Fronto-orbital reconstruction using polymethyl methacrylate implant.

Authors:  Samiran Ghosh; Debolina Pramanick; Amit Ray; Richi Burman; Ashistaru Saha
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

9.  Frontal Bone Fractures and Frontal Sinus Injuries: Treatment Paradigms.

Authors:  Priya Jeyaraj
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.