Literature DB >> 17299040

Mice cloned from skin cells.

Jinsong Li1, Valentina Greco, Géraldine Guasch, Elaine Fuchs, Peter Mombaerts.   

Abstract

Adult stem cells represent unique populations of undifferentiated cells with self-renewal capacity. In many tissues, stem cells divide less often than their progeny. It has been widely speculated, but largely untested, that their undifferentiated and quiescent state may make stem cells more efficient as donors for cloning by nuclear transfer (NT). Here, we report the use of nuclei from hair follicle stem cells and other skin keratinocytes as NT donors. When keratinocyte stem cells (KSCs) were used as NT donors, 19 liveborn mice were obtained, 9 of which survived to adulthood. Embryonic keratinocytes and cumulus cells also gave rise to cloned mice. Although cloning efficiencies were similar (<6% per transferred blastocyst), success rates were consistently higher for males than for females. Adult keratinocyte stem cells were better NT donors than so-called transit amplifying (TA) keratinocytes in both sexes (1.6% vs. 0% in females and 5.4% vs. 2.8% in males). Our findings reveal skin as a source of readily accessible stem cells, the nuclei of which can be reprogrammed to the pluripotent state by exposure to the cytoplasm of unfertilized oocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17299040      PMCID: PMC1815251          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611358104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  Distinct stem cell populations regenerate the follicle and interfollicular epidermis.

Authors:  Vered Levy; Catherine Lindon; Brian D Harfe; Bruce A Morgan
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Inefficient reprogramming of the hematopoietic stem cell genome following nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Kimiko Inoue; Narumi Ogonuki; Hiromi Miki; Michiko Hirose; Shinichi Noda; Jin-Moon Kim; Fugaku Aoki; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Generation of cloned mice by direct nuclear transfer from natural killer T cells.

Authors:  Kimiko Inoue; Hiroshi Wakao; Narumi Ogonuki; Hiromi Miki; Ken-ichiro Seino; Rika Nambu-Wakao; Shinichi Noda; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Haruhiko Koseki; Masaru Taniguchi; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells.

Authors:  I Wilmut; A E Schnieke; J McWhir; A J Kind; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Rabbits generated from fibroblasts through nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Shangang Li; Xuejin Chen; Zhenfu Fang; Jianjun Shi; Hui Z Sheng
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  Mammalian nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Alexander Meissner; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Satoshi Kishigami; Eiji Mizutani; Hiroshi Ohta; Takafusa Hikichi; Nguyen Van Thuan; Sayaka Wakayama; Hong-Thuy Bui; Teruhiko Wakayama
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei.

Authors:  T Wakayama; A C Perry; M Zuccotti; K R Johnson; R Yanagimachi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Eight calves cloned from somatic cells of a single adult.

Authors:  Y Kato; T Tani; Y Sotomaru; K Kurokawa; J Kato; H Doguchi; H Yasue; Y Tsunoda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Molecular dissection of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in the hair follicle.

Authors:  Michael Rendl; Lisa Lewis; Elaine Fuchs
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Reprogramming somatic cells to their embryonic state.

Authors:  Valerie Horsley; Elaine Fuchs
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2007-07-27

Review 3.  Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Konrad Hochedlinger; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 4.  Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming à la carte.

Authors:  Federico González; Stéphanie Boué; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Differentiation stage determines potential of hematopoietic cells for reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Sarah Eminli; Adlen Foudi; Matthias Stadtfeld; Nimet Maherali; Tim Ahfeldt; Gustavo Mostoslavsky; Hanno Hock; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Establishment and characterization of fetal fibroblast cell lines for generating human lysozyme transgenic goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Yan Luo; Liming Zheng; Qingqing Liu; Zhongcai Yang; Yongsheng Wang; Jianmin Su; Fusheng Quan; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Direct reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes to pluripotency.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Styliani Markoulaki; Patrick Schorderet; Bryce W Carey; Caroline Beard; Marius Wernig; Menno P Creyghton; Eveline J Steine; John P Cassady; Ruth Foreman; Christopher J Lengner; Jessica A Dausman; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Melanocyte stem cells: biology and current aspects.

Authors:  Monika Gola; Rafał Czajkowski; Anna Bajek; Aleksander Dura; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-10

9.  Notch inhibition allows oncogene-independent generation of iPS cells.

Authors:  Justin K Ichida; Julia Tcw; Luis A Williams; Ava C Carter; Yingxiao Shi; Marcelo T Moura; Michael Ziller; Sean Singh; Giovanni Amabile; Christoph Bock; Akihiro Umezawa; Lee L Rubin; James E Bradner; Hidenori Akutsu; Alexander Meissner; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 10.  Immunological challenges associated with artificial skin grafts: available solutions and stem cells in future design of synthetic skin.

Authors:  Saurabh Dixit; Dieudonné R Baganizi; Rajnish Sahu; Ejowke Dosunmu; Atul Chaudhari; Komal Vig; Shreekumar R Pillai; Shree R Singh; Vida A Dennis
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.