OBJECTIVE: To characterize the smoking-related services available to childhood cancer survivors and describe organizational characteristics that were related to institutions' capacity to provide smoking services. METHODS: Institutions affiliated with the Children's Oncology Group were surveyed from 2003 to 2004. RESULTS: Of the 132 responding institutions, 85% assessed the smoking status of their cancer survivors intermittingly, but only 3% assessed smoking status at every visit, as recommended by the PHS guidelines. A minority of sites offered either smoking prevention (39%) or cessation (25%) services; 58% of sites had a mechanism in place to refer survivors for cessation services. In multivariate analyses, the most parsimonious model predicting capacity for smoking service delivery included barriers, respondents' attitudes, complexity, and institutional stability. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight an important need to improve the availability of smoking services for childhood cancer survivors. Additionally, these findings will inform the development of future interventions that are sensitive to barriers and facilitators to providing prevention services.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the smoking-related services available to childhood cancer survivors and describe organizational characteristics that were related to institutions' capacity to provide smoking services. METHODS: Institutions affiliated with the Children's Oncology Group were surveyed from 2003 to 2004. RESULTS: Of the 132 responding institutions, 85% assessed the smoking status of their cancer survivors intermittingly, but only 3% assessed smoking status at every visit, as recommended by the PHS guidelines. A minority of sites offered either smoking prevention (39%) or cessation (25%) services; 58% of sites had a mechanism in place to refer survivors for cessation services. In multivariate analyses, the most parsimonious model predicting capacity for smoking service delivery included barriers, respondents' attitudes, complexity, and institutional stability. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight an important need to improve the availability of smoking services for childhood cancer survivors. Additionally, these findings will inform the development of future interventions that are sensitive to barriers and facilitators to providing prevention services.
Authors: Taghrid Asfar; Noella A Dietz; Kristopher L Arheart; Stacey L Tannenbaum; Laura A McClure; Lora E Fleming; David J Lee Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Luke J Peppone; Karen M Mustian; Gary R Morrow; Ann M Dozier; Deborah J Ossip; Michelle C Janelsins; Lisa K Sprod; Scott McIntosh Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-12-01
Authors: James L Klosky; Ashley M Hum; Nan Zhang; Khatidja S Ali; D Kumar Srivastava; Robert C Klesges; Karen M Emmons; Kirsten K Ness; Marilyn Stovall; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Elisa Martinez; Kristina L Tatum; Dorothy M Weber; Natalie Kuzla; Anna Pendley; Kirsten Campbell; John A Ridge; Corey Langer; Curtis Miyamoto; Robert A Schnoll Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Janet S de Moor; Elaine Puleo; Jennifer S Ford; Mark Greenberg; David C Hodgson; Vida L Tyc; Jamie Ostroff; Lisa R Diller; Andrea Gurmankin Levy; Kim Sprunck-Harrild; Karen M Emmons Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Karen M Emmons; Elaine Puleo; Ann Mertens; Ellen R Gritz; Lisa Diller; Frederick P Li Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 50.717