BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Visualizing with MR imaging and obtaining quantitative indexes of degeneration of the substantia nigra in Parkinson disease have been long-sought goals. We investigated the potential role of area and T1 contrast measurements in differentiating patients from controls and their age-related changes. METHODS: Eight patients with Parkinson disease, 8 age-matched controls, and 8 young controls were imaged. We obtained the pixel-wise difference between 2 sets of inversion-recovery images, acquired parallel to the bicommissural plane, with different inversion times. Pixel-intensity ratios between lateral and medial nigral regions, and nigral area and substantia-nigra/midbrain area ratios were computed. RESULTS: Compared with that of controls, loss of substantia nigra was evident in patients, its borders taking a smoother and more irregular appearance. Patients were characterized by a lateral-to-medial gradient, due to reduced hypointensity of the lateral portion of the substantia nigra and relative sparing of its medial portion. The visible nigral area was significantly smaller in patients compared with matched controls (P = .04). The substantia nigra/midbrain area ratio enabled considerably better separation (P = .0001). The lateral/medial pixel-intensity ratio was significantly higher in patients compared with matched controls (P = .01) and in young controls compared with age-matched controls (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Inversion-recovery sequences may provide a convenient way to visualize nigral degeneration. Relative area and pixel-intensity measurements may integrate other techniques (such as diffusion-tensor imaging on nigrostriatal pathways) in the neuroradiologic diagnosis and follow-up of Parkinson disease by quantitatively assessing the degeneration of the substantia nigra.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Visualizing with MR imaging and obtaining quantitative indexes of degeneration of the substantia nigra in Parkinson disease have been long-sought goals. We investigated the potential role of area and T1 contrast measurements in differentiating patients from controls and their age-related changes. METHODS: Eight patients with Parkinson disease, 8 age-matched controls, and 8 young controls were imaged. We obtained the pixel-wise difference between 2 sets of inversion-recovery images, acquired parallel to the bicommissural plane, with different inversion times. Pixel-intensity ratios between lateral and medial nigral regions, and nigral area and substantia-nigra/midbrain area ratios were computed. RESULTS: Compared with that of controls, loss of substantia nigra was evident in patients, its borders taking a smoother and more irregular appearance. Patients were characterized by a lateral-to-medial gradient, due to reduced hypointensity of the lateral portion of the substantia nigra and relative sparing of its medial portion. The visible nigral area was significantly smaller in patients compared with matched controls (P = .04). The substantia nigra/midbrain area ratio enabled considerably better separation (P = .0001). The lateral/medial pixel-intensity ratio was significantly higher in patients compared with matched controls (P = .01) and in young controls compared with age-matched controls (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Inversion-recovery sequences may provide a convenient way to visualize nigral degeneration. Relative area and pixel-intensity measurements may integrate other techniques (such as diffusion-tensor imaging on nigrostriatal pathways) in the neuroradiologic diagnosis and follow-up of Parkinson disease by quantitatively assessing the degeneration of the substantia nigra.
Authors: B Ravina; D Eidelberg; J E Ahlskog; R L Albin; D J Brooks; M Carbon; V Dhawan; A Feigin; S Fahn; M Guttman; K Gwinn-Hardy; H McFarland; R Innis; R G Katz; K Kieburtz; S J Kish; N Lange; J W Langston; K Marek; L Morin; C Moy; D Murphy; W H Oertel; G Oliver; Y Palesch; W Powers; J Seibyl; K D Sethi; C W Shults; P Sheehy; A J Stoessl; R Holloway Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael F H Schocke; Klaus Seppi; Regina Esterhammer; Christian Kremser; Katherina J Mair; Benedikt V Czermak; Werner Jaschke; Werner Poewe; Gregor K Wenning Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: K Seppi; M F H Schocke; R Esterhammer; C Kremser; C Brenneis; J Mueller; S Boesch; W Jaschke; W Poewe; G K Wenning Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-03-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Domenico Aquino; Valeria Contarino; Alberto Albanese; Ludovico Minati; Laura Farina; Marina Grisoli; Luigi Romita; Antonio Emanuele Elia; Antonio Elia; Maria Grazia Bruzzone; Luisa Chiapparini Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: M Cosottini; D Frosini; I Pesaresi; G Donatelli; P Cecchi; M Costagli; L Biagi; R Ceravolo; U Bonuccelli; M Tosetti Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T T Winton-Brown; A Ting; R Mocellin; M Walterfang; D Velakoulis; F Gaillard Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Yiming Xiao; Vladimir S Fonov; Silvain Beriault; Ian Gerard; Abbas F Sadikot; G Bruce Pike; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Paula Trujillo; Paul E Summers; Alex K Smith; Seth A Smith; Luca T Mainardi; Sergio Cerutti; Daniel O Claassen; Antonella Costa Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 2.804