OBJECTIVE: To describe atypical phenotypes associated with the retinoschisis (X-linked, juvenile) 1 mutation (RS1). METHODS: Seven patients with multiple fine white dots at the macula and reduced visual acuity were evaluated. Six patients underwent pattern and full-field electroretinography (ERG). On-off ERG, optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging were performed in some patients. Mutational screening of RS1 was prompted by the ERG findings. RESULTS: Fine white dots resembling drusenlike deposits and sometimes associated with retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities were present in the maculae. An electronegative bright-flash ERG configuration was present in all patients tested, and abnormal pattern ERG findings confirmed macular dysfunction. A parafoveal ring of high-density autofluorescence was present in 3 eyes; 1 patient showed high-density foci concordant with the white dots. Optical coherence tomography did not show foveal schisis in 3 of 4 eyes. All patients carried mutations in RS1, including 1 with a novel 206T-->C mutation in exon 4. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple fine white dots at the macula may be the initial fundus feature in RS1 mutation. Electrophysiologic findings suggest dysfunction after phototransduction and enable focused mutational screening. Autofluorescence imaging results suggest early retinal pigment epithelium involvement; a parafoveal ring of high-density autofluorescence has not previously been described in this disorder.
OBJECTIVE: To describe atypical phenotypes associated with the retinoschisis (X-linked, juvenile) 1 mutation (RS1). METHODS: Seven patients with multiple fine white dots at the macula and reduced visual acuity were evaluated. Six patients underwent pattern and full-field electroretinography (ERG). On-off ERG, optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging were performed in some patients. Mutational screening of RS1 was prompted by the ERG findings. RESULTS: Fine white dots resembling drusenlike deposits and sometimes associated with retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities were present in the maculae. An electronegative bright-flash ERG configuration was present in all patients tested, and abnormal pattern ERG findings confirmed macular dysfunction. A parafoveal ring of high-density autofluorescence was present in 3 eyes; 1 patient showed high-density foci concordant with the white dots. Optical coherence tomography did not show foveal schisis in 3 of 4 eyes. All patients carried mutations in RS1, including 1 with a novel 206T-->C mutation in exon 4. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple fine white dots at the macula may be the initial fundus feature in RS1 mutation. Electrophysiologic findings suggest dysfunction after phototransduction and enable focused mutational screening. Autofluorescence imaging results suggest early retinal pigment epithelium involvement; a parafoveal ring of high-density autofluorescence has not previously been described in this disorder.
Authors: Cornelia M Mooy; L Ingeborgh Van Den Born; Seerp Baarsma; Dion A Paridaens; Thea Kraaijenbrink; Arthur Bergen; Bernhard H F Weber Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2002-07
Authors: Anthony G Robson; Jack D Moreland; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Tony Morrissey; Graham E Holder; Fred W Fitzke; Alan C Bird; Frederik J G M van Kuijk Journal: Vision Res Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Anthony G Robson; Ahmed El-Amir; Claire Bailey; Catherine A Egan; Frederick W Fitzke; Andrew R Webster; Alan C Bird; Graham E Holder Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Bernhard H F Weber; Heinrich Schrewe; Laurie L Molday; Andrea Gehrig; Karen L White; Mathias W Seeliger; Gesine B Jaissle; Christoph Friedburg; Ernst Tamm; Robert S Molday Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-04-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yong Zeng; Yuichiro Takada; Sten Kjellstrom; Kelaginamane Hiriyanna; Atsuhiro Tanikawa; Eric Wawrousek; Nizar Smaoui; Rafael Caruso; Ronald A Bush; Paul A Sieving Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jana Zernant; Carl Schubert; Kate M Im; Tomas Burke; Carolyn M Brown; Gerald A Fishman; Stephen H Tsang; Peter Gouras; Michael Dean; Rando Allikmets Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Luiz H Lima; Jonathan P Greenberg; Vivienne C Greenstein; R Theodore Smith; Juliana M F Sallum; Charles Thirkill; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; Stephen H Tsang Journal: Retina Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Jacque L Duncan; Kavitha Ratnam; David G Birch; Sanna M Sundquist; Anna S Lucero; Yuhua Zhang; Meira Meltzer; Nizar Smaoui; Austin Roorda Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Agnes B Renner; Ulrich Kellner; Britta Fiebig; Elke Cropp; Michael H Foerster; Bernhard H F Weber Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Veronika Vaclavik; Marie-Claire Gaillard; L Tiab; Daniel F Schorderet; Francis L Munier Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: N-K Wang; H F Fine; S Chang; C L Chou; W Cella; J Tosi; C-S Lin; T Nagasaki; S H Tsang Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 4.638