Literature DB >> 1729615

Chromosomal organization of Xenopus laevis oocyte and somatic 5S rRNA genes in vivo.

C C Chipev1, A P Wolffe.   

Abstract

We describe the chromosomal organization of the major oocyte and somatic 5S RNA genes of Xenopus laevis in chromatin isolated from erythrocyte nuclei. Both major oocyte and somatic 5S DNA repeats are associated with nucleosomes; however, differences exist in the organization of chromatin over the oocyte and somatic 5S RNA genes. The repressed oocyte 5S RNA gene is protected from nuclease digestion by incorporation into a nucleosome, and the entire oocyte 5S DNA repeat is assembled into a loosely positioned array of nucleosomes. In contrast, the potentially active somatic 5S RNA gene is accessible to nuclease digestion, and the majority of somatic 5S RNA genes appear not to be incorporated into positioned nucleosomes. Evidence is presented supporting the stable association of transcription factors with the somatic 5S RNA genes. Histone H1 is shown to have a role both in determining the organization of nucleosomes over the oocyte 5S DNA repeat and in repressing transcription of the oocyte 5S RNA genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1729615      PMCID: PMC364068          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.12.1.45-55.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  56 in total

1.  Repeating units of Xenopus laevis oocyte-type 5S DNA are heterogeneous in length.

Authors:  D Carroll; D D Brown
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Chromatin structure of the 5S ribonucleic acid genes of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  S E Humphries; D Young; D Carroll
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1979-07-24       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Nucleosome arrangement on tRNA genes of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  P N Bryan; H Hofstetter; M L Birnstiel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Template-engaged and free RNA polymerases during Xenopus erythroid cell maturation.

Authors:  C C Hentschel; J R Tata
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Transition from noncooperative to cooperative and selective binding of histone H1 to DNA.

Authors:  M Renz; L A Day
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1976-07-27       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Nonrandom alignment of nucleosomes on 5S RNA genes of X. laevis.

Authors:  J M Gottesfeld; L S Bloomer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Sequence organization of a cloned tDNA met fragment from Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  S G Clarkson; V Kurer; H O Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The nucleotide sequence of oocyte 5S DNA in Xenopus laevis. I. The AT-rich spacer.

Authors:  N V Fedoroff; D D Brown
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Regulation of the higher-order structure of chromatin by histones H1 and H5.

Authors:  J Allan; G J Cowling; N Harborne; P Cattini; R Craigie; H Gould
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin.

Authors:  F Thoma; T Koller; A Klug
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  26 in total

1.  Rearrangement of chromatin domains during development in Xenopus.

Authors:  Y Vassetzky; A Hair; M Méchali
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Survey and summary: transcription by RNA polymerases I and III.

Authors:  M R Paule; R J White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Restricted specificity of Xenopus TFIIIA for transcription of somatic 5S rRNA genes.

Authors:  Romi Ghose; Mariam Malik; Paul W Huber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Histone tail-independent chromatin binding activity of recombinant cohesin holocomplex.

Authors:  Alexander Kagansky; Lita Freeman; Dmitry Lukyanov; Alexander Strunnikov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Differential effect of H1 variant overproduction on gene expression is due to differences in the central globular domain.

Authors:  D T Brown; A Gunjan; B T Alexander; D B Sittman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Differential association of HMG1 and linker histones B4 and H1 with dinucleosomal DNA: structural transitions and transcriptional repression.

Authors:  K Ura; K Nightingale; A P Wolffe
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Histone H1 reduces the frequency of initiation in Xenopus egg extract by limiting the assembly of prereplication complexes on sperm chromatin.

Authors:  Z H Lu; D B Sittman; P Romanowski; G H Leno
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  The AT-rich flanks of the oocyte-type 5S RNA gene of Xenopus laevis act as a strong local signal for histone H1-mediated chromatin reorganization in vitro.

Authors:  R Tomaszewski; A Jerzmanowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-mediated repression of the Xenopus Oocyte 5 S rRNA genes.

Authors:  Mariam Q Malik; Michelle M Bertke; Paul W Huber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Modulation of differential transcription of tRNA genes through chromatin organization.

Authors:  Akhila Parthasarthy; Karumathil P Gopinathan
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.