INTRODUCTION: Quantitative measurements of T(2) relaxation in the hippocampus for focus lateralization in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) are well established. Less is known to what degree such relaxation abnormalities also affect regions beyond the ipsilateral hippocampus. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize extent and distribution pattern of extrahippocampal relaxation abnormalities in TLE with (TLE-MTS) and without MRI evidence of mesial-temporal sclerosis (TLE-no). METHODS: Double spin echo images (TE1/2: 20/80 ms) acquired in 24 TLE-MTS and 18 TLE-no were used to calculate relaxation rate maps. These maps were analyzed by SPM2 and by selecting regions of interest (ROI) in the hippocampus and several extrahippocampal brain regions. RESULTS: In TLE-MTS, the results of the SPM and ROI analysis were in good agreement and showed the most severe relaxation rate decreases in the ipsilateral hippocampus but also in other ipsilateral temporal regions, orbitofrontal, and parietal regions and to a lesser degree in contralateral frontal regions. The relaxation rate decreases in TLE-no were confined to small regions in the ipsilateral anterior inferior and medial temporal lobe in the SPM analysis while ROI analysis showed additional regions in the ipsilateral hippocampus, amygdala, and anterior cingulate. CONCLUSION: TLE-MTS showed extensive, widespread but predominantly ipsilateral temporal and also extratemporal T(2) relaxation rate decreases. In contrast, the findings of the SPM and ROI analyses in TLE-no suggested that if relaxation rate decreases are present, they are less uniform and generally milder than in TLE-MTS. This further supports the hypothesis that TLE-no is a distinct clinicopathological entity from TLE-MTS and probably heterogeneous in itself.
INTRODUCTION: Quantitative measurements of T(2) relaxation in the hippocampus for focus lateralization in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) are well established. Less is known to what degree such relaxation abnormalities also affect regions beyond the ipsilateral hippocampus. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize extent and distribution pattern of extrahippocampal relaxation abnormalities in TLE with (TLE-MTS) and without MRI evidence of mesial-temporal sclerosis (TLE-no). METHODS: Double spin echo images (TE1/2: 20/80 ms) acquired in 24 TLE-MTS and 18 TLE-no were used to calculate relaxation rate maps. These maps were analyzed by SPM2 and by selecting regions of interest (ROI) in the hippocampus and several extrahippocampal brain regions. RESULTS: In TLE-MTS, the results of the SPM and ROI analysis were in good agreement and showed the most severe relaxation rate decreases in the ipsilateral hippocampus but also in other ipsilateral temporal regions, orbitofrontal, and parietal regions and to a lesser degree in contralateral frontal regions. The relaxation rate decreases in TLE-no were confined to small regions in the ipsilateral anterior inferior and medial temporal lobe in the SPM analysis while ROI analysis showed additional regions in the ipsilateral hippocampus, amygdala, and anterior cingulate. CONCLUSION:TLE-MTS showed extensive, widespread but predominantly ipsilateral temporal and also extratemporal T(2) relaxation rate decreases. In contrast, the findings of the SPM and ROI analyses in TLE-no suggested that if relaxation rate decreases are present, they are less uniform and generally milder than in TLE-MTS. This further supports the hypothesis that TLE-no is a distinct clinicopathological entity from TLE-MTS and probably heterogeneous in itself.
Authors: J von Oertzen; H Urbach; I Blümcke; M Reuber; F Träber; T Peveling; C Menzel; C E Elger Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-01-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Lamusuo; L Jutila; A Ylinen; R Kälviäinen; E Mervaala; M Haaparanta; S Jääskeläinen; K Partanen; M Vapalahti; J Rinne Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2001-06
Authors: A Bernasconi; N Bernasconi; Z Caramanos; D C Reutens; F Andermann; F Dubeau; D Tampieri; B G Pike; D L Arnold Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: P Van Bogaert; N Massager; P Tugendhaft; D Wikler; P Damhaut; M Levivier; J Brotchi; S Goldman Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Christina C Young; Michael Stegen; René Bernard; Martin Müller; Josef Bischofberger; Rüdiger W Veh; Carola A Haas; Jakob Wolfart Journal: J Physiol Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Jeffrey R Binder; Jia-Qing Tong; Sara B Pillay; Lisa L Conant; Colin J Humphries; Manoj Raghavan; Wade M Mueller; Robyn M Busch; Linda Allen; William L Gross; Christopher T Anderson; Chad E Carlson; Mark J Lowe; John T Langfitt; Madalina E Tivarus; Daniel L Drane; David W Loring; Monica Jacobs; Victoria L Morgan; Jane B Allendorfer; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Leonardo Bonilha; Susan Bookheimer; Thomas Grabowski; Jennifer Vannest; Sara J Swanson Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: C Scanlon; S G Mueller; D Tosun; I Cheong; P Garcia; J Barakos; M W Weiner; K D Laxer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Susanne G Mueller; Kenneth D Laxer; Jerome Barakos; Ian Cheong; Daniel Finlay; Paul Garcia; Valerie Cardenas-Nicolson; Michael W Weiner Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Diego Cantor-Rivera; John S H Baxter; Sandrine de Ribaupierrre; Jonathan C Lau; Seyed M Mirsattari; Maged Goubran; Jorge G Burneo; David A Steven; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 2.924