Literature DB >> 17295297

Body size prediction from juvenile skeletal remains.

Christopher Ruff1.   

Abstract

There are currently no methods for predicting body mass from juvenile skeletal remains and only a very limited number for predicting stature. In this study, stature and body mass prediction equations are generated for each year from 1 to 17 years of age using a subset of the Denver Growth Study sample, followed longitudinally (n = 20 individuals, 340 observations). Radiographic measurements of femoral distal metaphyseal and head breadth are used to predict body mass and long bone lengths are used to predict stature. In addition, pelvic bi-iliac breadth and long bone lengths are used to predict body mass in older adolescents. Relative prediction errors are equal to or smaller than those associated with similar adult estimation formulae. Body proportions change continuously throughout growth, necessitating age-specific formulae. Adult formulae overestimate stature and body mass in younger juveniles, but work well in 17-year-olds from the sample, indicating that in terms of body proportions they are representative of the general population. To illustrate use of the techniques, they are applied to the juvenile Homo erectus (ergaster) KNM-WT 15000 skeleton. New body mass and stature estimates for this specimen are similar to previous estimates derived using other methods. Body mass estimates range from 50 to 53 kg, and stature was probably slightly under 157 cm, although a precise stature estimate is difficult to determine due to differences in linear body proportions between KNM-WT 15000 and the Denver reference sample. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17295297     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  13 in total

1.  Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of the proximal femur and the pelvis in children and adolescents using an upright biplanar slot-scanning X-ray system.

Authors:  Kinga Szuper; Ádám Tibor Schlégl; Eleonóra Leidecker; Csaba Vermes; Szabolcs Somoskeöy; Péter Than
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-08-26

2.  Neandertal clavicle length.

Authors:  Erik Trinkaus; Trenton W Holliday; Benjamin M Auerbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts.

Authors:  Amanda R Hale; Ann H Ross
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Brain ontogeny and life history in Pleistocene hominins.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Hublin; Simon Neubauer; Philipp Gunz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Measures of maturation in early fossil hominins: events at the first transition from australopiths to early Homo.

Authors:  M Christopher Dean
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Baby steps towards linking calcaneal trabecular bone ontogeny and the development of bipedal human gait.

Authors:  Jaap P P Saers; Timothy M Ryan; Jay T Stock
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Revisiting the estimation of dinosaur growth rates.

Authors:  Nathan P Myhrvold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Estimating body mass and composition from proximal femur dimensions using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Emma Pomeroy; Veena Mushrif-Tripathy; Bharati Kulkarni; Sanjay Kinra; Jay T Stock; Tim J Cole; Meghan K Shirley; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Archaeol Anthropol Sci       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.989

9.  Child development, physiological stress and survival expectancy in prehistoric fisher-hunter-gatherers from the Jabuticabeira II shell mound, South Coast of Brazil.

Authors:  Luis Pezo-Lanfranco; José Filippini; Marina Di Giusto; Cecília Petronilho; Veronica Wesolowski; Paulo DeBlasis; Sabine Eggers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross-sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton.

Authors:  Emma Pomeroy; Alison Macintosh; Jonathan C K Wells; Tim J Cole; Jay T Stock
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.