Literature DB >> 17294266

Measurement of selected indoor physical environmental factors in hairdresser salons in a Turkish City.

E D Evci1, M D Bilgin, S Akgör, S G Zencirci, F Ergiń, E Beşer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine electromagnetic fields, electric fields, humidity, temperature, and illumination levels in hairdresser salons located in the downtown area of Aydin, Turkey. Also some health problems which could be related with the occupational factors are evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in 30 hairdresser salons, all of which had been registered within the past 5 years. Electric and electromagnetic fields, illumination, temperature and humidity measurements were determined for hairdryers, hood hairdryers and depilatory heaters in the participating salons. A brief questionnaire about characteristics and the health status of hairdressers and workplace conditions was prepared and administered to the hairdressers at the salons.
RESULTS: The mean electric fields of hairdryers, hood hairdryers and depilatory heaters were determined as 518 +/- 74, 1,123 +/- 199, and 648 +/- 146 in V/m, respectively, at 5 cm from the surface of each device. These appliances generate mean electromagnetic fields in excess of 0.25 microT at 5 cm: hand-held hairdryers, 5.0 +/- 0.7 microT; hood hairdryers, 1.6 +/- 0.3 microT; and depilatory heaters 1.9 +/- 0.6 microT. Total average of cumulative electric and electromagnetic fields, measured at a distance of 90 cm from the surface of these three devices was calculated to be 98.8 V/m and 0.5 microT, in the participating salons.
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that physical environmental factors in the salons may be contributing to the health problems of the hairdressers, and the electrical equipment in the workplaces may have cumulative electric and electromagnetic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17294266     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9637-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  4 in total

1.  Does our electricity distribution system pose a serious risk to public health?

Authors:  D L Henshaw
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  The influence of indoor environment quality on psychosocial work climate among office workers.

Authors:  Chatchai Ekpanyaskul; Wiroj Jiamjarasrangsi
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2004-09

Review 3.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  A Ahlbom; N Day; M Feychting; E Roman; J Skinner; J Dockerty; M Linet; M McBride; J Michaelis; J H Olsen; T Tynes; P K Verkasalo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Indoor air in beauty salons and occupational health exposure of cosmetologists to chemical substances.

Authors:  Alexandra Tsigonia; Argyro Lagoudi; Stavroula Chandrinou; Athena Linos; Nikos Evlogias; Evangelos C Alexopoulos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Occupational health risks of barbers and coiffeurs in Izmir.

Authors:  Aliye Mandiracioglu; Sukran Kose; Ayhan Gozaydin; Melda Turken; Lutfiye Kuzucu
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-08

3.  Airborne exposure to chemical substances in hairdresser salons.

Authors:  Elena Ronda; Bjorg Eli Hollund; Bente E Moen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Working Conditions and Health Risk Assessment in Hair Salons.

Authors:  Pattama Senthong; Sivasit Wittayasilp
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2021-06-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.