Literature DB >> 17294177

Exploring number space by random digit generation.

Tobias Loetscher1, Peter Brugger.   

Abstract

There is some evidence that human subjects preferentially select small numbers when asked to sample numbers from large intervals "at random". A retrospective analysis of single digit frequencies in 16 independent experiments with the Mental Dice Task (generation of digits 1-6 during 1 min) confirmed the occurrence of small-number biases (SNBs) in 488 healthy subjects. A subset of these experiments suggested a spatial nature of this bias in the sense of a "leftward" shift along the number line. First, individual SNBs were correlated with leftward deviations in a number line bisection task (but unrelated to the bisection of physical lines). Second, in 20 men, the magnitude of SNBs significantly correlated with leftward attentional biases in the judgment of chimeric faces. Finally, cognitive activation of the right hemisphere enhanced SNBs in 20 different men, while left hemisphere activation reduced them. Together, these findings provide support for a spatial component in random number generation. Specifically, they allow an interpretation of SNBs in terms of "pseudoneglect in number space." We recommend the use of random digit generation for future explorations of spatial-attentional asymmetries in numerical processing and discuss methodological issues relevant to prospective designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17294177     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0889-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases.

Authors:  M H Fischer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls.

Authors:  D R Gitelman; A C Nobre; T B Parrish; K S LaBar; Y H Kim; J R Meyer; M Mesulam
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina R Roberts
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Inge M Keus
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

5.  Images of numbers, or "When 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue".

Authors:  X Seron; M Pesenti; M P Noël; G Deloche; J A Cornet
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-08

6.  Three parietal circuits for number processing.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Manuela Piazza; Philippe Pinel; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effects of rotation on spatial attention.

Authors:  J Shuren; T Hartley; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol       Date:  1998-04

8.  Two subjective scales of number.

Authors:  W P Banks; M J Coleman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-02

9.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude.

Authors:  Rebecca Bull; Philip J Benson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.587

View more
  25 in total

1.  Representational pseudoneglect and reference points both influence geographic location estimates.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; Christine Mohr; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Random walks on the mental number line.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Benford's law and number selection in fixed-odds numbers game.

Authors:  Mabel C Chou; Qingxia Kong; Chung-Piaw Teo; Zuozheng Wang; Huan Zheng
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2009-07-30

4.  Influence of finger and mouth action observation on random number generation: an instance of embodied cognition for abstract concepts.

Authors:  Stéphane Grade; Arnaud Badets; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-29

5.  Number generation bias after action observation.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Cédric A Bouquet; François Ric; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Emotional faces influence numerosity estimation without awareness.

Authors:  Hirokazu Doi; Kazuyuki Shinohara
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-07-15

7.  Acute peripheral vestibular deficit increases redundancy in random number generation.

Authors:  Ivan Moser; Dominique Vibert; Marco D Caversaccio; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Gravity modulates behaviour control strategy.

Authors:  Maria Gallagher; Iqra Arshad; Elisa Raffaella Ferrè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Carlo Umiltà; Konstantinos Priftis; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Which numbers do you have in mind? Number generation is influenced by reading direction.

Authors:  Silke M Göbel; Carolin A Maier; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.