Literature DB >> 11448508

A comparison of the different interpair intervals in the conditioning-testing P50 paradigms.

N Dolu1, C Süer.   

Abstract

The conditioning-testing P50 paradigm is used to demonstrate sensory gating of responsiveness to auditory stimuli. Sensory gating is measured in terms of a suppression of the second (test) P50 component in that paradigm. The time course of sensory gating can be determined by examining subjects' gating of responsiveness to stimuli repeated at various interpair intervals. In the present study auditory evoked potentials were recorded using a paired click, conditioning-testing P50 paradigm in 11 normal subjects with no family history of any psychotic disorder. Recordings were made at conditioning-testing intervals of 250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms and 1000 ms. Whereas the grand averages of the P50 conditioning-testing response for the 250- and 500-ms intervals were 3.07% and 37.2%, respectively, indicating almost complete suppression, the grand averages of the ratios for the 750- and 1000-ms intervals were 114.35% and 92.92%, respectively, indicating little or no suppression. There was significant correlation in the C-T ratios with the increasing intervals. Our results suggest that the mechanism(s) responsible for sensory gating is activated mostly during the 500 ms after stimulus presentation. Other gating mechanism(s) functioning at longer intervals appear to be uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448508     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(01)00134-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  9 in total

1.  Generators of the intracranial P50 response in auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Mark E Pflieger; Michael Wagner; Susan M Bowyer; T Rosburg; Karthik Sundaresan; Christian Erich Elger; Nashaat N Boutros
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Influence of emotional states on inhibitory gating: animals models to clinical neurophysiology.

Authors:  Howard C Cromwell; Rachel M Atchley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  One-day tropisetron treatment improves cognitive deficits and P50 inhibition deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Luyao Xia; Lei Liu; Xiaohong Hong; Dongmei Wang; Gaoxia Wei; Jiesi Wang; Huixia Zhou; Hang Xu; Yang Tian; Qilong Dai; Hanjing E Wu; Catherine Chang; Li Wang; Thomas R Kosten; Xiang Yang Zhang
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Impairment in Mismatch Negativity but not Repetition Suppression in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Brian A Coffman; Sarah M Haigh; Tim K Murphy; Dean F Salisbury
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Diminished P50, N100 and P200 auditory sensory gating in bipolar I disorder.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; F Gerard Moeller; Nash N Boutros; Joel L Steinberg; Stacey L Meier; Scott D Lane; Alan C Swann
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Diminished Infant P50 Sensory Gating Predicts Increased 40-Month-Old Attention, Anxiety/Depression, and Externalizing Symptoms.

Authors:  Amanda K Hutchison; Sharon K Hunter; Brandie D Wagner; Elizabeth A Calvin; Gary O Zerbe; Randal G Ross
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.256

7.  Genetic Determinants of Gating Functions: Do We Get Closer to Understanding Schizophrenia Etiopathogenesis?

Authors:  Rastislav Rovný; Dominika Besterciová; Igor Riečanský
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Reduced habituation of auditory evoked potentials indicate cortical hyper-excitability in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  L E Ethridge; S P White; M W Mosconi; J Wang; M J Byerly; J A Sweeney
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Differential modulation of the auditory steady state response and inhibitory gating by chloral hydrate anesthesia.

Authors:  Yuchen Wang; Lanlan Ma; Xuejiao Wang; Ling Qin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.