Literature DB >> 17292679

ATR signaling mediates an S-phase checkpoint after inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity.

Julie K Horton1, Donna F Stefanick, Padmini S Kedar, Samuel H Wilson.   

Abstract

Human fibroblasts, capable of expressing a kinase-dead form of ATR (ATRkd), can be sensitized to the cytotoxic effects of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) by the PARP inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide (4-AN). The combination of MMS+4-AN results in accumulation of cells in S-phase of the cell cycle and activation of Chk1. Inhibition of ATR activity by expression of ATRkd suppresses the S-phase accumulation and partially reverses the Chk1 phosphorylation. The results confirm involvement of an ATR-mediated damage response pathway in the MMS+4-AN-induced S-phase cell cycle checkpoint in human fibroblasts. Consistent with this hypothesis, the inhibitors caffeine and UCN-01 also abrogate the ATR- and Chk1-mediated delay in progression through S-phase. In the absence of ATR-mediated signaling, MMS+4-AN exposure results in a G(2)/M arrest, rather than an S-phase checkpoint. Thus, whereas ATR mediates the S-phase response, it is not critical for arrest of cells in G(2)/M.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17292679      PMCID: PMC2367098          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  37 in total

1.  Cell cycle perturbations following DNA damage in the presence of ADP-ribosylation inhibitors.

Authors:  E L Jacobson; R Meadows; J Measel
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Preparing nuclei from cells in monolayer cultures suitable for counting and for following synchronized cells through the cell cycle.

Authors:  W B Butler
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1984-08-15       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 3.  The PARP superfamily.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Amé; Catherine Spenlehauer; Gilbert de Murcia
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  ATM and DNA-PK function redundantly to phosphorylate H2AX after exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Tom Stiff; Mark O'Driscoll; Nicole Rief; Kuniyoshi Iwabuchi; Markus Löbrich; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  ATR affecting cell radiosensitivity is dependent on homologous recombination repair but independent of nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Hongyan Wang; Huichen Wang; Simon N Powell; George Iliakis; Ya Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Factors modifying 3-aminobenzamide cytotoxicity in normal and repair-deficient human fibroblasts.

Authors:  R J Boorstein; A B Pardee
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  In situ analysis of repair processes for oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Li Lan; Satoshi Nakajima; Yoshitsugu Oohata; Masashi Takao; Satoshi Okano; Mitsuko Masutani; Samuel H Wilson; Akira Yasui
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ablation of PARP-1 does not interfere with the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, but compromises the reactivation of stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Yun-Gui Yang; Ulrich Cortes; Srinivas Patnaik; Maria Jasin; Zhao-Qi Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Involvement of DNA polymerase beta in protection against the cytotoxicity of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Julie K Horton; Audrey Baker; Brian J Vande Berg; Robert W Sobol; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2002-04-29

10.  Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase activates ATM which is required for subsequent homologous recombination repair.

Authors:  Helen E Bryant; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  14 in total

1.  The ups and downs of DNA repair biomarkers for PARP inhibitor therapies.

Authors:  Xiaozhe Wang; David T Weaver
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Interaction between PARP-1 and ATR in mouse fibroblasts is blocked by PARP inhibition.

Authors:  Padmini S Kedar; Donna F Stefanick; Julie K Horton; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-08-22

3.  Alternative Chk1-independent S/M checkpoint in somatic cells that prevents premature mitotic entry.

Authors:  Doaa Hussein Zineldeen; Noha Mohamed Shafik; Sheng Fan Li
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Increased PARP-1 association with DNA in alkylation damaged, PARP-inhibited mouse fibroblasts.

Authors:  Padmini S Kedar; Donna F Stefanick; Julie K Horton; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  Alkylation DNA damage in combination with PARP inhibition results in formation of S-phase-dependent double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Michelle L Heacock; Donna F Stefanick; Julie K Horton; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-06-22

6.  Requirement for NBS1 in the S phase checkpoint response to DNA methylation combined with PARP inhibition.

Authors:  Julie K Horton; Donna F Stefanick; Jennifer Y Zeng; Michael J Carrozza; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-12-03

7.  The PARP inhibitor PJ34 causes a PARP1-independent, p21 dependent mitotic arrest.

Authors:  Dana L Madison; Daniel Stauffer; James R Lundblad
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-08-12

8.  PARP inhibition during alkylation-induced genotoxic stress signals a cell cycle checkpoint response mediated by ATM.

Authors:  Michael J Carrozza; Donna F Stefanick; Julie K Horton; Padmini S Kedar; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-08-31

9.  Bypass of hexavalent chromium-induced growth arrest by a protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor: enhanced survival and mutagenesis.

Authors:  Dongsoon Bae; Tura C Camilli; Gina Chun; Madhu Lal; Kristen Wright; Travis J O'Brien; Steven R Patierno; Susan Ceryak
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Kinetics of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, but not PARP1 itself, determines the cell fate in response to DNA damage in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Harald Schuhwerk; Christopher Bruhn; Kanstantsin Siniuk; Wookee Min; Suheda Erener; Paulius Grigaravicius; Annika Krüger; Elena Ferrari; Tabea Zubel; David Lazaro; Shamci Monajembashi; Kirstin Kiesow; Torsten Kroll; Alexander Bürkle; Aswin Mangerich; Michael Hottiger; Zhao-Qi Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.