Literature DB >> 17291628

Morphological and physiological responses of two coffee progenies to soil water availability.

Paulo C Dias1, Wagner L Araujo, Gustavo A B K Moraes, Raimundo S Barros, Fábio M DaMatta.   

Abstract

Drought is a major environmental constraint affecting growth and production of coffee. The effects of water supply on growth, biomass allocation, water relations, and gas exchange in two coffee progenies representing drought-tolerant (Siriema) and drought-sensitive (Catucaí) genotypes were compared. They were grown in 12-L pots until 4-months old, when they were submitted to two watering treatments for 60 d: plants receiving either 100% transpired water (control plants) or a fraction (about 40%) of the amount of water transpired by control plants (drought-stressed plants). Under control conditions, Siriema grew faster than Catucaí. Regardless of the watering regimes and progenies, relative growth rate (RGR) was positively correlated both with net assimilation rate (NAR) and long-term water-use efficiency (WUE), but not with differences in biomass allocation. Both progenies responded to drought stress through (i) similar decreases in both RGR and NAR with marginal, if any, changes in allocation; (ii) decreases in leaf water potential, which occurred to a greater extent in Catucaí than in Siriema, even though they have showed similar abilities to adjust osmotically and elastically; (iii) similar reductions in net photosynthesis due mainly to nonstomatal factors; and (iv) decreases in transpiration rate coupled with increased long-term WUE. However, the lower transpiration rate and the higher long-term WUE as found in Siriema relative to Catucaí under control conditions persisted under drought conditions. Overall, the major differences between these progenies were largely associated with differences in plant water use, which was likely related to the improved water status of Siriema. The possible implications of selecting coffee genotypes for high WUE are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291628     DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0176-1617            Impact factor:   3.549


  10 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Transcriptomes of Diploid and Tetraploid Miscanthus lutarioriparius under Drought Stress.

Authors:  Xitong Xu; Shukai Wang; Yanbin Han; Yancui Wang; Pingping Xu; Cuixia Chen; Guobin Zhang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Differentiate responses of tetraploid and hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to moderate and severe drought stress: a cue of wheat domestication.

Authors:  Yanwen Gui; Mohamed S Sheteiwy; Shuangguo Zhu; Li Zhu; Asfa Batool; Tingting Jia; Youcai Xiong
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2020-10-30

3.  Euphorbia tirucalli L.-comprehensive characterization of a drought tolerant plant with a potential as biofuel source.

Authors:  Bernadetta Rina Hastilestari; Marina Mudersbach; Filip Tomala; Hartmut Vogt; Bettina Biskupek-Korell; Patrick Van Damme; Sebastian Guretzki; Jutta Papenbrock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Differential drought tolerance in tree populations from contrasting elevations.

Authors:  Fei Ma; Ting Ting Xu; Ming Fei Ji; Chang Ming Zhao
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.276

5.  Intraspecific Trait Variation and Coordination: Root and Leaf Economics Spectra in Coffee across Environmental Gradients.

Authors:  Marney E Isaac; Adam R Martin; Elias de Melo Virginio Filho; Bruno Rapidel; Olivier Roupsard; Karel Van den Meersche
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Coffee production in southern Saudi Arabian highlands: Current status and water conservation.

Authors:  Osama H Sayed; Yahya S Masrahi; M Remesh; B S Al-Ammari
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Impact of drought associated with high temperatures on Coffea canephora plantations: a case study in Espírito Santo State, Brazil.

Authors:  Luan Peroni Venancio; Roberto Filgueiras; Everardo Chartuni Mantovani; Cibele Hummel do Amaral; Fernando França da Cunha; Francisco Charles Dos Santos Silva; Daniel Althoff; Robson Argolo Dos Santos; Paulo Cezar Cavatte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Drought responses of three closely related Caragana species: implication for their vicarious distribution.

Authors:  Fei Ma; Xiaofan Na; Tingting Xu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Optimizing coffee cultivation and its impact on economic growth and export earnings of the producing countries: The case of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmed M Al-Abdulkader; Ali A Al-Namazi; Turki A AlTurki; Muteb M Al-Khuraish; Abdullah I Al-Dakhil
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Resilient and Sensitive Key Points of the Photosynthetic Machinery of Coffea spp. to the Single and Superimposed Exposure to Severe Drought and Heat Stresses.

Authors:  Danielly Dubberstein; Fernando C Lidon; Ana P Rodrigues; José N Semedo; Isabel Marques; Weverton P Rodrigues; Duarte Gouveia; Jean Armengaud; Magda C Semedo; Sónia Martins; Maria C Simões-Costa; I Moura; Isabel P Pais; Paula Scotti-Campos; Fábio L Partelli; Eliemar Campostrini; Ana I Ribeiro-Barros; Fábio M DaMatta; José C Ramalho
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.753

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.