Literature DB >> 17291144

Influence of severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation on complications at the proximal neck following endovascular AAA repair: a EUROSTAR study.

Roel Hobo1, Jur Kievit, Lina J Leurs, Jacob Buth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the influence of severe infrarenal neck angulation (SNA) on complications after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
METHODS: From October 1996 to January 2006, 5183 patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair using a Talent, Zenith, or Excluder stent-graft were enrolled into the EUROSTAR registry. Incidence of proximal type I endoleak, stent-graft migration, proximal neck dilatation, aneurysm rupture, secondary interventions, and all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality were compared between patients with and without severe infrarenal neck angulation (>60 degrees angle between the infrarenal aortic neck and the longitudinal axis of the aneurysm).
RESULTS: In the short term (before discharge), proximal type I endoleak (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.37, p<0.0001) and stent-graft migration (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.91, p=0.0105) were observed more frequently in patients with SNA. Over the long term, higher incidences of proximal neck dilatation > or =4 mm (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.43, p=0.0004), proximal type I endoleak (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.58, p=0.0016), and need for secondary interventions (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.67, p=0.0488) were seen in patients with SNA. All-cause mortality, aneurysm-related mortality, and rupture of the aneurysm were similar in patients with and without severe neck angulation. In the subgroup of patients with an Excluder endograft, proximal endoleak at the completion angiogram (OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.31 to 15.32, p=0.0166) and long-term proximal neck dilatation (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.33, p=0.0026) were more frequently observed in patients with SNA. In the Zenith subgroup, proximal endoleak at the completion angiogram (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.49 to 4.63, p=0.0009) and proximal stent-graft migration before discharge (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.19, p=0.0353) were more common in patients with SNA. In the Talent subgroup, long-term proximal endoleak (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.44, p=0.0036), proximal neck dilatation (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.60, p=0.0168), and secondary interventions (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.24, p=0.0259) were more frequently observed in patients with SNA.
CONCLUSION: Severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation was clearly associated with proximal type I endoleak, while the relationship with stent-graft migration was not clear. Excluder, Zenith, and Talent stent-grafts perform well in patients with severe neck angulation, with only a few differences among devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291144     DOI: 10.1583/06-1914.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  23 in total

1.  Thirty-day mortality and late survival with reinterventions and readmissions after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Kristina A Giles; Bruce E Landon; Philip Cotterill; A James O'Malley; Frank B Pomposelli; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Effect of curvature on displacement forces acting on aortic endografts: a 3-dimensional computational analysis.

Authors:  C Alberto Figueroa; Charles A Taylor; Victoria Yeh; Allen J Chiou; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.487

3.  Prevention of Kinked Stent Graft Limb Due to Severe Angulated Proximal Neck during Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Pyung Chun Oh; Minsu Kim; Eak Kyun Shin; Woong Chol Kang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.520

4.  Aortic Neck Anatomic Features and Predictors of Outcomes in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Following vs Not Following Instructions for Use.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Michael Yacoub; Albeir Y Mousa; Shadi Abu-Halimah; Stephen M Hass; Jenna Kazil; Zachary T AbuRahma; Mohit Srivastava; L Scott Dean; Patrick A Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Migration of the Zenith Flex Device during Endovascular Aortic Repair of an Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm with a Severely Angulated Neck.

Authors:  Yukihisa Ogawa; Hiroshi Nishimaki; Kiyoshi Chiba; Kenji Murakami; Yuka Sakurai; Keishi Fujiwara; Takeshi Miyairi; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2016-07-15

6.  A computational framework for investigating the positional stability of aortic endografts.

Authors:  Anamika Prasad; Nan Xiao; Xiao-Yan Gong; Christopher K Zarins; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2012-11-10

7.  Kilt Technique as an Angle Modification Method for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Severe Neck Angle.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Kim; Ho-Jun Jang; Young Jin Choi; Chang Keun Lee; Sung Woo Kwon; Won-Heum Shim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 1.520

8.  Patient demographics and cardiovascular risk factors differentially influence geometric remodeling of the aorta compared with the peripheral arteries.

Authors:  Dimitrios Miserlis; Peter Adamson; Micah Adamson; Thomas Knowles; Jamil Neme; Alexey Kamenskiy; Panagiotis Koutakis; Nicholas Phillips; Iraklis Pipinos; Jason MacTaggart
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Automated quantification of aortoaortic and aortoiliac angulation for computed tomographic angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms before endovascular repair: preliminary study.

Authors:  Bhargav Raman; Raghav Raman; Sandy Napel; Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 10.  Advanced Endovascular Approaches in the Management of Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy: Traditional Endografts and the Snorkel Technique.

Authors:  Jon G Quatromoni; Ksenia Orlova; Paul J Foley
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.