Arlene S Bierman1, Beth Hartman Ellis, David Drachman. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, ON, Canada. arlene.bierman@utoronto.ca
Mental and physical health and functioning are intrinsically linked, and this relationship has distinct implications for the delivery of health care to elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Depressive symptoms are associated with an increased risk of physical decline, disability, and mortality (Covinsky et al., 1999; Oslin et al., 2000; and Penninx et al., 1998). The association between chronic illness and depression is well documented. Chronic conditions, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, are associated with a higher risk of depression (Whyte et al., 2004). Among patients with coronary artery disease, symptom burden and physical limitations are associated with a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms (Ruo et al., 2003). Among diabetics, instability of blood sugar levels is associated with fluctuations in mood and mental functioning. (Sommerfield, Deary, and Frier, 2004). Disability is also associated with an increased risk of depression. Thus, in order to optimize both physical and mental health outcomes, improved management of both physical and mental illness is essential.Although improved management of depression in clinical practice improves physical functioning (Callahan et al., 2005), the quality of care for depression in Medicare managed care has been shown to be suboptimal (Virnig et al., 2004). Furthermore, there are racial disparities in both the prevalence of depressive disorders and in the quality of depression care (Strothers et al., 2005). The quality of care for mental illness and depression has been found to be poorer for minority managed care enrollees than for White enrollees (Virnig et al., 2004). Additionally, the higher prevalence of depression among Hispanics and Black enrollees can be attributed to their higher burden of chronic illness and worse access to care (Dunlop et al., 2003).Using data from the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS), we profile the mental health status of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in managed care by examining the association between two measures of mental health: depressed mood and the mental component summary (MCS) score of the RAND® 36-Item Health Survey (RAND® SF-36) and sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, and disability. The HOS is designed to assess the physical functioning and mental well-being of Medicare managed care beneficiaries. Beginning in 1998 and continuing annually, a Medicare HOS baseline cohort is created from a random sample of 1,000 members from Medicare Advantage (MA) plans in the United States. In plans with fewer than 1,000 Medicare members the sample consists of the entire enrolled Medicare population that meets the inclusion criteria. The data collection protocol includes a combination of multiple mailings and telephone followup (over a period of approximately 4 months). The complete data collection protocol can be found in the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS®) specifications (National Committee for Quality Assurance, 2000).In these analyses, a completed survey was defined as having a calculable physical component summary (PCS), and MCS score at baseline, using the 1998 norm-based standard scoring algorithm (Ware and Kosinski, 2001; Ware and Sherbourne, 1992). Depressed mood was defined as an affirmative response to the following item: “In the past year have you felt depressed or sad much of the time?” The following figures are based on the responses of 274,687 community-dwelling individuals age 65 or over enrolled in Medicare managed care who participated and were self-respondents to the Cohorts II and III baseline surveys. Proxy respondents (individuals who completed the survey questionnaire for the beneficiary, or who assisted the beneficiary with completion of the questionnaire) were excluded. The sample is 57.2 percent female, with a mean age of 73.7 (standard deviation [SD], 6.0), and a mean MCS score of 52.7 (SD, 9.7).Sociodemographic factors (older age, female sex, low income, lower levels of educational attainment, and Black, Hispanic, or Native American ethnicity), health status (number of physical chronic conditions), functional status (activities of daily living [ADLs] limitations), and insurance status (dually eligible) are associated with a higher prevalence of depressed mood. While females in general are more likely to report depressed mood than males, the prevalence of depressed mood among males age 85 or over increases and is nearly identical to that for females in that age group. One in five females with less than an eighth grade education, and close to one in five females with annual household incomes less than $10,000, and Hispanic or Native American females report depressed mood. Among enrollees reporting four or more chronic conditions, 22 percent of females and 17 percent of males who report having a depressed mood, compared to 5 percent of females and 3 percent of males report no chronic conditions. Among enrollees reporting three or more ADL limitations, 30 percent of females and 26 percent of males report feeling depressed much of the time in the last year. Among dually eligible enrollees, 23 percent of males and 26 percent of females reported depressed mood compared to 8 percent of males and 12 percent of females who are not dually eligible (data not shown).Mean MCS scores among elderly Medicare enrollees are somewhat higher than those for the general U.S. population. However, MCS scores vary by demographic characteristics, health and functional status, and insurance status. Mean MCS scores are lowest among enrollees reporting low income, low levels of educational attainment, four or more chronic conditions, or three or more ADL limitations, as well as the dually eligible enrollees. For example, respondents reporting three or more ADL limitations have mean MCS scores that are 10 points or one full SD lower than respondents reporting no ADL limitations. Patterns of association for MCS scores differ somewhat from those for depressed mood for some population subgroups because factors other than depression contribute to mental health, and because there may be differences in reporting of depressed mood by different population subgroups. For example, females may be more willing to report depressed mood than males. While females report a higher prevalence of depressed mood than males, differences in MCS scores by sex are small. Likewise, while Black, Hispanic, and Native American respondents are more likely to report depressed mood than White and Asian respondents, there are only small differences in mean MCS scores associated with race and ethnicity.There is a growing evidence base for interventions to improve the quality of depression care in general medical practice. Specific interventions have been shown to result in improved physical and mental health outcomes, and to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes of care (Miranda et al., 2003; Wells et al., 2004). Our findings illustrate the potential benefit that may be derived from identifying and treating high-risk enrollees for depression. Further research is needed on the impact of improved management of other mental health conditions on physical and mental functioning, as well as the impact of improved management of chronic conditions and associated symptoms on mental functioning. Effective models are needed to better integrate mental health and medical services for elderly Medicare beneficiaries, as well as evaluation of the cost effectiveness of these strategies.
Authors: Christopher M Callahan; Kurt Kroenke; Steven R Counsell; Hugh C Hendrie; Anthony J Perkins; Wayne Katon; Polly Hitchcock Noel; Linda Harpole; Enid M Hunkeler; Jürgen Unützer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Harry S Strothers; George Rust; Patrick Minor; Edith Fresh; Benjamin Druss; David Satcher Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Bernice Ruo; John S Rumsfeld; Mark A Hlatky; Haiying Liu; Warren S Browner; Mary A Whooley Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-07-09 Impact factor: 56.272