Literature DB >> 1729058

Aortic pressure during human cardiac arrest. Identification of pseudo-electromechanical dissociation.

N A Paradis1, G B Martin, M G Goetting, E P Rivers, M Feingold, R M Nowak.   

Abstract

We measured aortic pressure during clinically apparent cardiac electromechanical dissociation (EMD). Patients with pulse pressures were designated as having pseudo-EMD; those without, as having true EMD. Of the 200 patients studied, 54 presented with EMD, and 40 others developed it during resuscitation. Of the 94 with EMD, 39 were found to have pseudo-EMD. We compared the two types of EMD for electrocardiographic duration, return of palpable pulses, and response to standard- and high-dose epinephrine. The mean resting aortic pressure was 18 +/- 11 mm Hg in patients with true EMD and 28 +/- 11 mm Hg in those with pseudo-EMD. The mean pulse pressure in patients with pseudo-EMD was 6.3 +/- 3.5 mm Hg. Patients with pseudo-EMD had a higher proportion of witnessed arrests, higher PaO2, and lower PaCO2 than patients with true EMD. Patients with pseudo-EMD had shorter QR and QRS durations than patients with true EMD. They had a better response to standard- and high-dose epinephrine than patients with true EMD. Many patients diagnosed clinically to be in EMD have mechanical cardiac activity; this should be considered when interpreting the results of cardiac arrest research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1729058     DOI: 10.1378/chest.101.1.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac arrest: resuscitation and reperfusion.

Authors:  Kaustubha D Patil; Henry R Halperin; Lance B Becker
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Mechanism of death: there's more to it than sudden cardiac arrest.

Authors:  David C Parish; Hemant Goyal; Francis C Dane
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Handheld Doppler to improve pulse checks during resuscitation of putative pulseless electrical activity arrest.

Authors:  Robert B Schonberger; Rachel J Lampert; Ernest I Mandel; Jessica Feinleib; Zhaodi Gong; Shyoko Honiden
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Presence of an arterial line improves response to simulated hypotension and pulseless electrical activity.

Authors:  Jonathan Lipps; Andrew Goldberg; Samuel DeMaria; Yury Khelemsky; Adam Levine; Vedat Yildiz; Bryan Mahoney
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Detection of spontaneous pulse using the acceleration signals acquired from CPR feedback sensor in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Liang Wei; Gang Chen; Zhengfei Yang; Tao Yu; Weilun Quan; Yongqin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A simplified and structured teaching tool for the evaluation and management of pulseless electrical activity.

Authors:  Laszlo Littmann; Devin J Bustin; Michael W Haley
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 1.927

7.  Epinephrine plus chest compressions is superior to epinephrine alone in a hypoxia-induced porcine model of pseudo-pulseless electrical activity.

Authors:  Felipe Teran; Claire Centeno; Alexander L Lindqwister; William J Hunckler; William P Landis; Karen L Moodie; Frances S Shofer; Benjamin S Abella; Norman A Paradis
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-04-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.