Literature DB >> 17288888

Homonymous Hemianopia: A Critical Analysis of Optical Devices, Compensatory Training, and NovaVision.

Victoria S Pelak1, Mark Dubin, Edward Whitney.   

Abstract

Homonymous hemianopia (HH) results from damage to visual pathways posterior to the optic chiasm. Due to the significant functional impairment that can result, rehabilitative techniques and devices intended to improve visual function after HH have been explored and are reviewed here. Two basic treatment strategies include use of optical devices and compensatory training. A third strategy, purported to be based on the principles of neuronal plasticity of the visual cortex, is aimed at visual field recovery by computerized training. This strategy is trademarked as visual restoration therapy (VRT) by NovaVision (Boca Raton, FL), which began marketing its commercialized therapy program in 2003 for the treatment of visual loss related to stroke and traumatic brain injury. In regard to compensatory training and optical devices, a standardized methodology is lacking, and very few controlled studies exist in regard to efficacy. Outcome data regarding effectiveness of VRT are conflicting, as are the opinions of investigators who have studied and reviewed VRT. There is some evidence that expansion of visual fields by VRT may be the result of very small eye movements. Functional outcomes for each strategy reveal subjective, but limited evidence or no objective evidence of functional improvement; therefore, it is difficult to recommend a specific treatment based on evidence for most patients. The decision to treat and the type of treatment to pursue for patients with HH should be individualized and guided by the type of injury, associated deficits, available resources, and the level of functional impairment manifested by the HH. Consultation with a low-vision specialist (preferably a specialist endorsed by an ophthalmologist or neuro-ophthalmologist) for treatment guidance is recommended.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17288888     DOI: 10.1007/s11940-007-0029-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol        ISSN: 1092-8480            Impact factor:   3.598


  32 in total

1.  Disappointing results from Nova Vision's visual restoration therapy.

Authors:  J C Horton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Vision restoration therapy and raising red flags too early.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases.

Authors:  X Zhang; S Kedar; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness.

Authors:  E Kasten; S Wüst; W Behrens-Baumann; B A Sabel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Eye movements in reading with hemianopic field defects: the significance of clinical parameters.

Authors:  S Trauzettel-Klosinski; K Brendler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Field expansion for homonymous hemianopia by optically induced peripheral exotropia.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke.

Authors:  A T Patel; P W Duncan; S M Lai; S Studenski
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia.

Authors:  O Meienberg; W H Zangemeister; M Rosenberg; W F Hoyt; L Stark
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness.

Authors:  G Kerkhoff; U Münssinger; E K Meier
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1994-05

10.  Homonymous hemianopic field defects and driving in Canada.

Authors:  J L Parisi; R A Bell; H Yassein
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.882

View more
  8 in total

1.  Treatment of homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Daniel R Gold; Lori L Grover
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Scanning training in neurological vision loss: case studies.

Authors:  Paul Koons; Scott Johnson; John Kingston; Gregory L Goodrich
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2010-05-24

Review 3.  Relearning to See in Cortical Blindness.

Authors:  Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 4.  The rehabilitation of hemianopic dyslexia.

Authors:  Susanne Schuett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  The effect of static scanning and mobility training on mobility in people with hemianopia after stroke: a randomized controlled trial comparing standardized versus non-standardized treatment protocols.

Authors:  Stacey George; Allison Hayes; Celia Chen; Maria Crotty
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Clinical treatment options for patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Alison R Lane; Daniel T Smith; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03

Review 7.  Visual rehabilitation: visual scanning, multisensory stimulation and vision restoration trainings.

Authors:  Neil M Dundon; Caterina Bertini; Elisabetta Làdavas; Bernhard A Sabel; Carolin Gall
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 8.  Homonymous hemianopia: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Denise Goodwin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.