Literature DB >> 17288620

An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements.

Gary Jones1, Miles Richardson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous research on nutrition labelling has mainly used subjective measures. This study examines the effectiveness of two types of nutrition label using two objective measures: eye movements and healthiness ratings.
DESIGN: Eye movements were recorded while participants made healthiness ratings for two types of nutrition label: standard and standard plus the Food Standards Agency's 'traffic light' concept.
SETTING: University of Derby, UK.
SUBJECTS: A total of 92 participants (mean age 31.5 years) were paid for their participation. None of the participants worked in the areas of food or nutrition.
RESULTS: For the standard nutrition label, participant eye movements lacked focus and their healthiness ratings lacked accuracy. The traffic light system helped to guide the attention of the consumer to the important nutrients and improved the accuracy of the healthiness ratings of nutrition labels.
CONCLUSIONS: Consumers have a lack of knowledge regarding how to interpret nutrition information for standard labels. The traffic light concept helps to ameliorate this problem by indicating important nutrients to which to pay attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17288620     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980007258513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  24 in total

1.  Predictors of nutrition label viewing during food purchase decision making: an eye tracking investigation.

Authors:  Dan J Graham; Robert W Jeffery
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 2.  Contextual influences on eating behaviours: heuristic processing and dietary choices.

Authors:  D A Cohen; S H Babey
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 3.  The effects of nutrition knowledge on food label use. A review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Diana L Cassady
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Location, location, location: eye-tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information.

Authors:  Dan J Graham; Robert W Jeffery
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-11

Review 5.  Nutrition standards for away-from-home foods in the USA.

Authors:  D A Cohen; R Bhatia
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 9.213

6.  Consumer perceptions of beef healthiness: results from a qualitative study in four European countries.

Authors:  Lynn Van Wezemael; Wim Verbeke; Marcia D de Barcellos; Joachim Scholderer; Federico Perez-Cueto
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Front of Pack Labels Enhance Attention to Nutrition Information in Novel & Commercial Brands.

Authors:  Mark W Becker; Nora M Bello; Raghav P Sundar; Chad Peltier; Laura Bix
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Ingrid Borgmeier; Joachim Westenhoefer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  The Relationship between Nutrition Knowledge and Nutrition Facts Table Use in China: A Structural Equation Model.

Authors:  Zeying Huang; Beixun Huang; Jiazhang Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Using change detection to objectively evaluate whether novel over-the-counter drug labels can increase attention to critical health information among older adults.

Authors:  Alyssa L Harben; Deborah A Kashy; Shiva Esfahanian; Lanqing Liu; Laura Bix; Mark W Becker
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.