Literature DB >> 17287646

Switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation technique using multiple, internally cooled electrodes and a multichannel generator: ex vivo and in vivo pilot study.

Jeong Min Lee1, Joon Koo Han, Hyo Cheol Kim, Young Hun Choi, Se Hyung Kim, Jin Young Choi, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the optimal switching time and interprobe distance for creating a large coagulation zone in the liver by switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) technique using a prototype multichannel radiofrequency generator and multiple electrodes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 3, 17-gauge, internally cooled electrodes and a prototype multichannel radiofrequency (RF) generator to allow automatic switching of RF energy among 3 electrodes according to their impedance changes, RF energy was applied in a switching monopolar mode to explanted bovine livers or to the livers of 7 dogs. In the ex vivo study, we evaluated the effect of the switching time (5, 15, 30, and 60 seconds) and the interprobe distance (3 cm and 4 cm) on the mean volume of the ablation zone using the switching RFA; we then compared the ablation volume of the switching RFA group (12 minutes) with that of the overlapping RFA group (12 minutes x 3 = 36 minutes). In our preliminary in vivo experiments using 2 dogs, the electrodes were placed in a triangular array (spacing 2 cm, 3 cm, 3.5 cm, or 4 cm) and were activated for 12 minutes or 20 minutes in a monopolar mode (power output 200 W). In our primary experiments using 5 dogs, RFA in a switching mode created 10 coagulation zones at a 2- to 3-cm interprobe distance. The duration of the RFA was 12 minutes. The size and geometry of the coagulation zone also were assessed.
RESULTS: In this ex vivo study, switching monopolar RFA at a 3-cm interprobe distance and at a 30-second switching time allowed the creation of a large, confluent ablation zone. There was no significant difference in the mean ablation volume between the overlapping (72.9 +/- 12.6(3) cm) and the switching RFA groups (65.7 +/- 12.6 cm(3); P>0.05). In the preliminary in vivo experiments, RFA created spherical coagulations at interprobe distances of 2 cm and 3 cm but at larger distances than 3 cm, RFA created partially confluent coagulation zones. In our principal experiments, switching RFA created areas of well-defined coagulation, ie, at a 2-cm interprobe distance, the volume and short-axis coagulation diameter were 35.5+/- 5.7(3) cm and 4.6 +/- 0.5 cm, respectively, whereas at 3 cm, they were 40.7 +/- 12.8(3) cm and 4.8 +/- 0.8 cm, respectively. The mean values of the circularity (isometric ratio) of the coagulation at the 2- and 3-cm interprobe distances were 0.95 +/- 0.02, and 0.85+/- 0.06, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that switching monopolar RFA using the multichannel RF system at a 2- or 3-cm interprobe distance and at a 30-second switching time can create a large, confluent coagulation zone in the liver within a clinically acceptable time frame. We believe that this technology will provide a useful tool for the treatment of large liver tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287646     DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000252495.44818.b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  18 in total

1.  Percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Reto Bale; Gerlig Widmann; Peter Schullian; Marion Haidu; Georg Pall; Alexander Klaus; Helmut Weiss; Matthias Biebl; Raimund Margreiter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablations using Octopus® electrodes in an in vivo porcine liver model.

Authors:  E S Lee; J M Lee; W S Kim; S H Choi; I Joo; M Kim; D H Yoo; R-E Yoo; J K Han; B I Choi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Switching bipolar hepatic radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled wet electrodes: comparison with consecutive monopolar and switching monopolar modes.

Authors:  J H Yoon; J M Lee; S Woo; E J Hwang; I Hwang; W Choi; J K Han; B I Choi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Hepatic radiofrequency ablation: in vivo and ex vivo comparisons of 15-gauge (G) and 17-G internally cooled electrodes.

Authors:  K D Song; M W Lee; H J Park; D I Cha; T W Kang; J Lee; J Y Moon; H Rhim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  History, ethics, advantages and limitations of experimental models for hepatic ablation.

Authors:  Seok Ling Ong; Gianpiero Gravante; Matthew S Metcalfe; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Thermal ablation of thyroid nodules: are radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and high intensity focused ultrasound equally safe and effective methods?

Authors:  Yücel Korkusuz; Daniel Gröner; Natascha Raczynski; Oleg Relin; Yasmina Kingeter; Frank Grünwald; Christian Happel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Tumour ablation: technical aspects.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Gerd Bodner; Reto Bale
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a possible complication of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Su Hyun Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Jae Young Lee; Soo Jin Kim; Min A Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Evaluation of the in vivo efficiency and safety of hepatic radiofrequency ablation using a 15-G Octopus® in pig liver.

Authors:  Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Kyung Won Kim; In Joon Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Dual switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode: comparison with consecutive and switching monopolar modes in ex vivo bovine livers.

Authors:  Jeong-Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.