Literature DB >> 17287380

Consent form readability and educational levels of potential participants in mental health research.

Paul P Christopher1, Mary Ellen Foti, Kristen Roy-Bujnowski, Paul S Appelbaum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Poor readability of informed consent forms has been a persistent problem in clinical research. The low educational attainments of many patients with mental illness might suggest a still greater problem in mental health settings. To explore this potential disparity, this study sought to determine whether the informed consent forms used in research approved by the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health were written at a grade level that was higher than that achieved by potential study participants.
METHODS: The readability (grade level necessary to read text) of informed consent forms for 154 studies was calculated with several standard formulas. Readability scores were stratified on the basis of the risk level of the study from which the consent form was taken. These data were then compared with data on the maximum attained grade level of potential participants aged 19 years or older.
RESULTS: The overall mean readability scores for the informed consent forms, as determined by the four methods, ranged from grade levels 12 to 14.5. Furthermore, the mean readability scores increased with higher risk levels of the studies. Approximately 35% of potential participants had not graduated from high school, 37% had graduated from high school or obtained a GED, and 28% had some education beyond the 12th grade.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate poor readability of informed consent forms used in research approved by the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health and highlight a mismatch between consent form readability and the educational level of potential study participants. The findings suggest that methods of reducing the complexity of forms, as part of improving the overall consent process, are much needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287380     DOI: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.2.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  13 in total

1.  Addressing risks to advance mental health research.

Authors:  Ana S Iltis; Sahana Misra; Laura B Dunn; Gregory K Brown; Amy Campbell; Sarah A Earll; Anne Glowinski; Whitney B Hadley; Ronald Pies; James M Dubois
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  Current State of Electronic Consent Processes in Behavioral Health: Outcomes from an Observational Study.

Authors:  Hiral Soni; Adela Grando; Anita Murcko; Mike Bayuk; Pramod Chandrashekar; Madhumita Mukundan; Meredith Abrams; Marcela P Aliste; Megan Hiestand; Julia Varkey; Wentao Zhou; Caroline Horrow; Michael Saks; Richard Sharp; Mary Jo Whitfield; Mark Callesen; Christy Dye; Darwyn Chern
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  Length and complexity of US and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Lelia Chaisson; Holly A Taylor; Jennifer Lohse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Readability of standard appointment letters.

Authors:  Daniel M Bennett; Anne Gilchrist
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2010-06

5.  Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.

Authors:  Rebekah E McWhirter; Lisa Eckstein
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Informed consent document improvement does not increase patients' comprehension in biomedical research.

Authors:  Adeline Paris; Christian Brandt; Catherine Cornu; Patrick Maison; Claire Thalamas; Jean-Luc Cracowski
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  The readability of information and consent forms in clinical research in France.

Authors:  Véronique Ménoni; Noël Lucas; Jean François Leforestier; Jérôme Dimet; François Doz; Gilles Chatellier; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Hélène Chappuy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Readability of the written study information in pediatric research in France.

Authors:  Véronique Ménoni; Noël Lucas; Jean-François Leforestier; François Doz; Gilles Chatellier; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigain; Carole Giraud; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Hélène Chappuy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Responsible governance for mental health research in low resource countries.

Authors:  M Taghi Yasamy; Pallab K Maulik; Mark Tomlinson; Crick Lund; Mark Van Ommeren; Shekhar Saxena
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Repeated assessments of informed consent comprehension among HIV-infected participants of a three-year clinical trial in Botswana.

Authors:  Lelia H Chaisson; Nancy E Kass; Bafanana Chengeta; Unami Mathebula; Taraz Samandari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.